.
BS
They have / had Trump and his kids under FISA surveillance.
The stuff they captured was eventually published.
And even that isn't even the most salient point -- that Sullivan easily overcomes this pleb's ridiculous knee-padding.
ok
lets have hunter sue for copyright infringement
Do ‘journalists’ give ‘the big guy’ a cut too? Of do they suck for free?
But tax returns are fine
You mean, like Trump’s leaked tax returns?
Hunter Biden owns the copyright to his emails (and images). Abandoning the computer in the repair shop did not change that, nor did it give the repair-shop owner a right to the computer’s data
/\
You ignorant urinalist shill, hunter signed a legal agreement with the repair guys shop.
Hunter abandoned the laptop.
It ceased being his property.
Additionally,
you obviously don’t have the foggiest clue as to what constitutes copy write.
.
This would clearly be “fair use” under copyright law and not a violation.
Was publishing the Pentagon Papers a copywrite violation?
Remember Palin’s emails?
“traditional news organizations such as The New York Times and The Washington Post used the Palin email dump as an experiment in new media techniques. They sought collaboration from readers and posted massive volumes of documents online before reporters even had a chance to read most of the papers.
(snip)
Tribune dispatched two journalists equipped with portable scanners to Juneau to pick up the thousands of Palin emails and begin digitizing them for online readers. Lauter said the first batch was posted on the Los Angeles Times website about 30 minutes after the documents were released Friday.
The New York Times, using a similar strategy, assigned a team to put all the documents online as soon as possible. It took 14 hours to post all of them.
(snip)
Technologically, the project seemed to succeed. Several outlets organized the files chronologically and made the documents searchable. The Associated Press made electronic scans available to members around the country.
(snip)
Steve Doig, a journalism professor at Arizona State University who specializes in computer-assisted reporting, said the crowdsourcing approach was clever - and one he hopes to see more of in the future.
“You don’t have to be a professional reporter to be able to recognize statements that might be newsworthy,” Doig said. “So, having lots and lots of eyeballs looking through it - whether it’s professional reporter or just somebody who’s looking for their own interest or amusement - you can more quickly find something newsworthy.”
They’re obviously panicked - so throwing all kinds of Sh!t at the wall, hoping like hell something, ANYTHING!!! sticks - to pull their boy BiteMe out of the fire.
“So what was the legal justification for allowing the publication of the emails?”
Public interest, just like when any newspaper publishes copyrighted material from a corporate whistleblower.
The Hunter Brandon story - still about the story, not the crimes.
They never cease to amaze..
This is one of the stupidest ideas I’ve seen in a long time. What a maroon!
Then all of journalism is a copyright violation.
It’s not a copyright violation if you didn’t copyright it.