Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The NCAA’s Own Goal: A January vote may permanently eliminate standardized-testing requirements for student-athletes.
James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal ^ | December 5, 2022 | Harrington Shaw

Posted on 12/06/2022 12:25:29 PM PST by karpov

This coming January, the NCAA will convene in Texas to decide the future of standardized testing requirements for student-athletes. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NCAA and universities nationwide have taken steps to waive or modify admissions and eligibility criteria. With the pandemic coming to an end, it is yet to be determined which policies and requirements will be reimplemented by these institutions and which may be scrapped entirely.

Division I and Division II college athletes are held to a specific set of academic eligibility requirements by the NCAA. These include a minimum GPA (2.3 for Division I and 2.2 for Division II), completion of 16 courses in core subject areas, and minimum test scores. The NCAA has historically used a ‘sliding scale’ to determine each student’s required ACT/SAT score. The higher a student’s GPA is, the lower his or her required test score will be. This ranges from a minimum SAT score of 400 for a student with a 3.55 GPA to a minimum score of 980 for a student with a 2.3 GPA.

As colleges and universities began waiving testing requirements during the pandemic, the NCAA followed suit. At the time, this decision was justifiable given that testing centers and schools were closed, students were not learning the requisite course material, and access to test preparation opportunities was limited for many students. The relevance of this rationale has faded over the past two years.

Given that the NCAA has also recently permitted the inclusion of pass/fail grades in final GPA computation, it is more important now than ever that test scores be utilized to hold student-athletes to a common standard. Despite this, the NCAA Standardized Test Task Force has recommended the “permanent removal of the test score requirement.”

(Excerpt) Read more at jamesgmartin.center ...


TOPICS: Education; Sports
KEYWORDS: collegesports; ncaa; sat; sport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2022 12:25:29 PM PST by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: karpov

With pervasive gambling, the transfer portal and not even academic lip service anymore, what could go wrong?


2 posted on 12/06/2022 12:29:40 PM PST by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Well, they’ve probably had other people doing their homework and taking their tests for them since Junior High, so what’s the problem? Keep spoiling them.


3 posted on 12/06/2022 12:30:45 PM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

They should call it the blacks are too stupid protocol.

If I was an intelligent black person, I would be pissed.


4 posted on 12/06/2022 12:33:57 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

Dexter Manley in his NFL Hall of Fame speech admitted he couldn’t read.
Oklahoma State must be proud…


5 posted on 12/06/2022 12:42:40 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Might as well, the transfer portal has made college completely a feeder league for the NFL (not that isn’t wasn’t mostly before).


6 posted on 12/06/2022 12:42:51 PM PST by mykroar (what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how. - J0eStalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
They should also call it the alumni are too stupid protocol.

At this point what real connection do "student athletes" have with the rest of the college population? In what way should your alma mater winning a game years after you graduated have any impact on your gifting?

But evidently lots of colleges will go into debt financing their sports teams because the alumni returns make it a net profit.

Sad. Truly sad.

7 posted on 12/06/2022 12:43:01 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (What is left around which to circle the wagons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: karpov

The NCAA should just be dealing with sporting rules. The colleges should handle the academics.


8 posted on 12/06/2022 12:44:18 PM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
They should call it the blacks are too stupid protocol. If I was an intelligent black person, I would be pissed.

These policies cast a pall over the genuine achievements of black Americans. We can never know, when dealing with black professionals, if they are in their position due to Affirmative Action or excellent performance. It is very patronizing. We treat an entire race of people like pets.

9 posted on 12/06/2022 12:45:44 PM PST by TexasKamaAina (The time is out of joint. - Hamlet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: karpov
The NCAA’s Own Goal: A January vote may permanently eliminate standardized-testing requirements for student-athletes.

The NCAA should quit pretending they are "student-athletes".

10 posted on 12/06/2022 12:45:50 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Ultra MAGA in Biden's Post Constitutional United Socialist States of Amerika!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

I would never give a penny to my university.
I paid tuition, we’re equal.
Football at my university makes a huge amount of money though.


11 posted on 12/06/2022 12:49:33 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Next they’ll waive attendance, and after that they’ll eliminate classes altogether.


12 posted on 12/06/2022 12:56:46 PM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." — M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Great. Remove the one incentive the student athletes had to actually study.


13 posted on 12/06/2022 12:57:53 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasKamaAina

I have Hispanic and Black friends (no, I’m not making “that comment”) who earned their degrees - professional aka graduate level ones - that make this very point. They find the leftist pandering of minorities offensive in the extreme. (Yes, they’re on our side. In fact make me look like a liberal by comparison.)


14 posted on 12/06/2022 1:03:31 PM PST by piytar (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I’d only make the athletes who want an actual major take classes. And if the athlete just wants basketweaving as a major, no need for classes.


15 posted on 12/06/2022 1:07:07 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

My college had entire departments just to keep the idiot athletes on the honor rolls.


16 posted on 12/06/2022 1:14:01 PM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

That’s the main purpose of the “Studies” Departments.


17 posted on 12/06/2022 1:39:08 PM PST by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: karpov

More of the nefarious process to “dumb down” American society.


18 posted on 12/06/2022 1:42:24 PM PST by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Good!


19 posted on 12/06/2022 1:43:49 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

How can the NCAA, an athletic association, set admission policies for member universities? This is pretty amazing, pretty blatant, to try and eliminate standardized admissions tests for athletes only.


20 posted on 12/06/2022 2:27:59 PM PST by Will88 (The only people opposing voter ID are those benefiting from voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson