VoterGA Releases Evidence of 20,000 Votes Being Removed from Herschel Walker’s Reported Totals in November Election

VoterGA released supporting evidence showing Herschel Walker did have 20,000 votes vanish from the amounts being reported by the media during the recent November election.

We reported previously on suspect reporting in the 2022 Senate race in Georgia. At one point in the evening, a large chunk of ballots was reported for Democrat Raphael Warnock that put him into the lead.

We also reported today that Warnock benefited more than any candidate in the US in the 2022 election from millions in donations from unemployed actors over the past year. This is criminal.

Today, VoterGA announced that they found evidence that 20,000 votes were removed from Herschel Walker’s totals during the election.

I looked into this ‘vote switching’ phenomenon after the 2020 election. It is an artifact of chimpanzees writing the reporting code for vote exporting vote tallies from the live totals on the Secretary of State website and then decoding those tallies for on screen display.

Instead of the export program exporting raw vote tallies for each candidate, like you or I would do, the government IT chimp thought it would be much more elegant to report the total number of votes cast, along with the percentage of that raw total awarded to each candidate. The media outlet IT chimps then take that data and take the percentages times the raw tally to produce the ‘number of votes’ for each candidate.

Just one problem, the percentage is reported to only the whole number plus one decimal place. This introduces an inherent variability due to the numerical concept of significant figures.

When I pay you 48.1 percent of a million dollars, I might be giving you as little as 480,500 dollars or as much as 481,499 dollars. Any number in that range is technically 48.1 percent. So any non chimp would just report it as 481,000 +/- 500. But those reporting are chimps, and don’t understand that any result with more than three significant digits is not accurate, so they assume that whatever number pops out of the calculation is accurate all the way to the decimal point.

When precincts report, some of them are overwhelming for one candidate or another, and also may have clusters of votes for a third party candidate. This can result in swings of an entire percentage point or more in some cases, which means the uncertainty on any given number spit out by the export software and reverse calculated by the media can be in the tens of thousands.

In my opinion the media chimps like this situation, as it causes voter consternation, which leads to more clicks. And the government chimps like it, because it draws attention away from the wholesale vote scams of mailing out hundreds of thousands of ballots to duplicate addresses and allowing third party collection and submission of patently unverifiable ballots. If anyone ever completely audited voter rolls and ballot envelope signatures I would be shocked if less than 10% of ballots in the country are fraudulent.

It’s not the machines. It never was. It’s the ballot fraud.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.