Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Court Throws Out Special Master For Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Documents Case
The Gateway Pundit ^ | December 1, 2022 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 12/01/2022 4:46:59 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man

A federal appeals court on Thursday halted Judge Aileen Cannon’s special master review in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago documents case.

In September, Judge Cannon appointed a special master to review the documents seized at Mar-a-Lago.

Biden’s corrupt Justice Department argued that a special master didn’t have a right to filter out the seized documents.

The court blasted Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, and said she erred in appointing Raymond Dearie as a special master to review documents seized from Mar-a-Lago.

“The law is clear,” the judges wrote. “We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so.”

Two of the three judges on a panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals were nominated by Trump.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: 11thcircuit; 52to43; 52to46; aileencannon; andrewlbrasher; brittgrant; chiefjudge; cia; doj; dubyajudge; eleventhcircuit; fbi; federalistsociety; grewinoffice; justinggrant; mcconnelljudge; mdalabama; sdflorida; smirkingchimpjudge; specialmaster; trump; trumpjudge; williampryorjr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Information that isn’t classified isn’t going to be considered “closely-held”.

But under your scenario it was classified material that Trump declassified so he could remove it.

Let's all hope it was still closely held.

61 posted on 12/02/2022 9:32:40 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

How would I know? I’m not Trump nor do I work for the DOJ so I don’t know what documents were there.


62 posted on 12/02/2022 10:12:33 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
How would I know? I’m not Trump nor do I work for the DOJ so I don’t know what documents were there.

The context of the question was the other poster saying he should have declassified them all.

63 posted on 12/02/2022 10:21:08 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Sure, and if the President had declassified them, then they by definition wouldn’t be “sensitive”.


64 posted on 12/02/2022 11:16:03 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Sure, and if the President had declassified them, then they by definition wouldn’t be “sensitive”.

LOL.

Whatever gets you through the night.

65 posted on 12/02/2022 11:18:18 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

It is what it is. The president has the ultimate authority, so his decisions are the basis for what is and isn’t sensitive, classified, etc. Nobody in the entire government can supercede his decisions.


66 posted on 12/02/2022 11:32:23 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

So they would have to be produced to the New York Slimes under a Freedom of Information request?


67 posted on 12/02/2022 12:32:19 PM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PatriotarchyQ

Sure, if they were declassified.


68 posted on 12/02/2022 2:15:04 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

So if Biden recklessly declassifies our highest level secrets, same result?


69 posted on 12/02/2022 2:25:39 PM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: PatriotarchyQ

Of course. The rules don’t change just because the President happens to be an idiot.


70 posted on 12/02/2022 2:39:00 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson