Posted on 11/18/2022 5:34:11 PM PST by george76
Nancy Pelosi rightfully will go down as one of the greatest speakers in the history of the U.S. House of Representatives. I’m not sure I would agree with Pelosi on a single policy issue; that’s not the point. As far as leadership ability and political smarts, Pelosi ran circles around the bumbling Republicans of her time.
Pelosi got things done for the Left in a way no recent Republican leader could for the Right. When the stakes were highest, she was able to corral her votes. Simultaneously, when the far Left went too far, she was willing to slap them down.
There’s a name for all this. It’s called leadership. Republicans are desperate for a leader like this in the House.
Before the 2006 elections, as the George W. Bush administration began cratering politically, the far Left began pushing to impeach him over the Iraq War. Pelosi led the charge against impeachment. She took on the far Left directly. They hated her for it.
But Pelosi knew that Democrats were winning politically and was smart enough to see that impeachment had the potential to shake that up. It worked. As a result, Democrats gained 30 seats in the House and took back control of the chamber for the first time in 12 years. This effectively ended the Bush administration’s power and paved the way for Barack Obama.
In the process, Pelosi was elected as the first female House speaker in history. She didn’t get it due to some 2022-style artificial diversity push. She earned it.
If Pelosi’s first big political test was holding off the far Left, her second test required walking moderate Democrats right off a cliff in the name of historic left-wing progress. In 2010, Democrats lost their filibuster-proof majority by losing a special Senate election in Massachusetts, of all places.
Even Obama saw this surprise Massachusetts defeat as the end for Obamacare. He was ready to cave and replace the massive federal health care takeover with a series of smaller bills. Pelosi wouldn’t have it. With the push for Obamacare, unlike the impeachment debate earlier, Pelosi found a cause she deemed more important than politics. Moderate Democrats knew their votes would cost them their seats, but Pelosi was able to get them to vote for Obamacare anyway.
In the end, Obamacare passed, and because of it, 63 Democrats predictably lost their House seats in the 2010 midterms. Pelosi lost the speakership. Through this process, she did something no recent Republican leader has come close to doing: She proved she was willing to lose political power to get things done. Democrats viewed Obamacare as the holy grail. To them, implementing it was worth the cost.
Conservatives should ask themselves: Is there a single issue recent Republican leaders feel that passionately about? What’s the point of winning elections if you aren’t going to do big things?
You don’t have to like Nancy Pelosi or Obamacare to admire this level of leadership and smarts. It’s precisely what has been lacking among congressional Republicans.
On the Right, the reformist side is so desperate for progress that they sometimes end up tilting at windmills, often at their political peril. Even worse, the larger establishment bloc is not really interested in getting things done.
To them, the election itself is the endgame. Washington service is largely a tryout for a career in corporate influence. They are happy to make some attempt at stopping the most left-wing policies, but real progress on a conservative agenda is not even something they contemplate. They don’t say it out loud, but the unwritten rule is anything at all that threatens reelection is off the table.
This is, of course, a perversion of the political process, but it’s 100% the mindset of the majority of Republicans in Washington.
Republicans love to hate Pelosi, and often for good reason. She was tough and even mean sometimes. On issues like COVID-19 and stock trading by members of Congress, she helped break trust with the American people. More broadly, she pushed through many policies that will hurt America badly.
This record is nothing to celebrate. But as a purely political matter, Pelosi has been by far the greatest congressional leader of our time. She ran her caucus with tight control. Nobody really crossed her, and she got things done.
The gap is so huge that the House Republicans she’s gone up against were never really in her league. Pelosi was both tougher and smarter than them. She usually ran circles around them. The honest truth is that conservatives are dying for a House leader of Nancy Pelosi’s caliber.
RNC has that woman; MTG.
Good point.
In this century Republicans have controlled the House for 14 years. In all that time is there any accomplishment that comes close to the victories the Dems had with Obamacare, TARP, or the Biden infrastructure bill?
No, Pelosi only had fellow travelers pretending to offer the Republican viewpoint.
Not really. A nasty, dictatorial, vicious witch? I don’t care which “side of the aisle” she’s on, I don’t want her.
We can accomplish our goals without that because they’re reasonable, fair and free.
We just need a good defender, not a toxic robo-dog attacker.
I can’t say I blame him for switching teams after being married to Nancy for that long.
What a load of crap.
Even if she did look great, it was BECAUSE of the bumbling republicans. Compared to bumbling idiots, anyone can look good if they half try.
Disagree about it being caused solely by bumbling republicans.
Rats are solid they march as one. They want power and they know they have close ranks and act as a block. What do republicans do, they fight each other first. They have battles over purity, they would rather be pure first then get power so consequently they have trouble getting power. For Rats its power power power !
That is true.
They are unified and that is their strength.
Republicans and conservatives tend to throw each other under the bus far too easily when there is some disagreement with policy or procedure. All one has to do is look at how Noem was treated over the transgender sports ban. The first bill the legislature passed had some flaws in it that could have been used by the left to cause more problems so she sent it back, and people had a cow over it.
Lots of FReepers, even, gave up on her completely over that one move, although the bill was reintroduced later and she did sign the newer, better worded version. But no, conservatives who whine about politicians betraying people, go and betray their politicians when they don’t even know the whole story.
Greatest? I doubt it. Most infamous? I can see that.
I see what you did there!
Roe vs Wade. I think that issue probably cost us 20-30 seats in the house. Maybe 1-2 seats in the Senate. But we were able to overturn it in the Supreme Court.
Crappy leaders. The only good one was Newt. But even then, he was filled with personal flaws. And mainstream media didn't back off at all. You need someone like him but who's squeaky clean. Trump is pretty clean (other than a little bit womanizing) but even there, he is getting hell from the Deep State and mainstream mediam
Yeah. Satan was a leader, too.
Sure. We Conservatives want a leader. But we aren’t willing to sell our souls to achieve power.
Does that make us weaker than them? Perhaps. But I won’t buy into the “we should do what they do” knowing full well it is venal and wrong.
Hitler was a great speaker also
Mine would clank, too, if I knew I could use the MSM to call up “mostly peaceful” BLM and Antifa “protesters” on demand. If I could use the Capitol Police as my personal arm of the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.