Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Trump's 2022 Election Performance
self ^ | 11/16/2022 | self

Posted on 11/16/2022 2:35:22 AM PST by fruser1

When I heard the immediate news reports across the board about how Trump endorsed candidates were losing, and given my general distrust of the press, I did some searches for reports on how many Trump endorsed candidates won.

Search results were all articles about how Trump endorsed candidates lost. So I looked at those thinking I would see some numbers such as number lost over the total run. But that critical factoid was missing, interestingly enough, from the ones I checked.

This told me that the fix was in and as I always do with subjects I actually have interest in, I started tabulating my own info based on race results.

One senate race and one house race is still uncallable, so below gives the worst case result (meaning the uncallable races don’t go with the Trump supported candidate)

Here’s the breakdown:

Governor – 9/18 = 50% Senate – 13/18 = 72% House – 97/119 = 81%

Hopefully this would mean he’d get more cooperation instead of back stabbing in congress.

Nevertheless, being that elections often hover around 50/50 results with a 51% win being great, I don’t see the 50% governor bit as a big negative.

This affirms for me that all those reports about how dumb it would be to support Trump because his candidates lose are total BS.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Don't be a sap for the "Trump can't win" scam. I saw many folks here turn against Trump because of the purported "negative" results of the elections.

Vote for who you want, not who you think everyone else wants.

1 posted on 11/16/2022 2:35:22 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Well, here in Arizona, it was clear - the Trump endorsement was kiss of death!
Enough to win the primary, not enough to actually win the general election!
Frankly, the Trump endorsees were terrible, I have no idea how he selected them?!
All statewide endorsed by Trump lost, all others won!


2 posted on 11/16/2022 2:40:50 AM PST by AZJeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

3 posted on 11/16/2022 2:42:25 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

Kari says AZ knows BS when they see it, so do I.


4 posted on 11/16/2022 2:42:49 AM PST by reviled downesdad (Some of the lost will never believe the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

The problem with your logic is that all races are not created equal. He made all the lay-ups but lost the majority of the competitive races.


5 posted on 11/16/2022 2:51:34 AM PST by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

So I guess won’t get 100% of the vote nationally. I kind of figured that.

Maybe two more years of increasing misery under socialist rule will make those non-Trump voters of their ways in 2024.


6 posted on 11/16/2022 2:53:00 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

And that would be the problem with the logic of the articles purporting Trump can’t win because of negative results, yes?

Yet after those reports across the board, many here jumped on the “Buckley Bandwagon” of vote for the most conservative candidate that can’t win theory, and turned on Trump.


7 posted on 11/16/2022 2:54:52 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: AZJeep

DeSantis campaigned for Kari Lake. Held a campaign rally for her. I guess he is the kiss of death too.


9 posted on 11/16/2022 2:59:11 AM PST by McCarthysGhost (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

Dude, smoking that crap will give you emphysema!


10 posted on 11/16/2022 3:08:02 AM PST by Sarcazmo ("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

Election theft makes it seem like some, for example AZ, campaigns were lost which were actually won. Have to consider election cheating when evaluating how well Trump did, in spite of those planning to steal. Yes, we have to stop the steal.


11 posted on 11/16/2022 3:08:19 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reviled downesdad

Me too.


12 posted on 11/16/2022 3:08:56 AM PST by Sarcazmo ("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

Ain’t that something?


13 posted on 11/16/2022 3:09:55 AM PST by Sarcazmo ("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

far left ABC Australia brings on Ornstein - who they once detested - to frame Trump’s announcement today. it gets really ridiculous from 3min in, with the ABC guy wondering whether democracy is returning to US, given the defeat of the most high profile election-denying candidates:

AUDIO: 4m22s: 16 Nov: ABC PM Program: Trump run for White House “unsettling” for democracy
by David Lipson
Despite growing resistance from within the Republican party, Donald Trump could succeed in a third nomination for the Presidential contest and go on to sit in the White House again.
Norman Ornstein from the American Enterprise Institute says that’s a really unsettling reality for people watching the health of American democracy.

Featured: Norman Ornstein, Emeritus Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/trump-run-for-white-house-unsettling-for-democracy/101662262


14 posted on 11/16/2022 3:18:13 AM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

far left ABC Australia brings on Ornstein - who they once detested - to frame Trump’s announcement today. it gets really ridiculous from 3min in, with the ABC guy wondering whether democracy is returning to US, given the defeat of the most high profile election-denying candidates:

AUDIO: 4m22s: 16 Nov: ABC PM Program: Trump run for White House “unsettling” for democracy
by David Lipson
Despite growing resistance from within the Republican party, Donald Trump could succeed in a third nomination for the Presidential contest and go on to sit in the White House again.
Norman Ornstein from the American Enterprise Institute says that’s a really unsettling reality for people watching the health of American democracy.

Featured: Norman Ornstein, Emeritus Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/trump-run-for-white-house-unsettling-for-democracy/101662262


15 posted on 11/16/2022 3:18:13 AM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

You’re completely FOS. Arizona is rife with fraud and THAT’S how the demons stole the election


16 posted on 11/16/2022 3:18:50 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MAGAthon

apologies for double post.


17 posted on 11/16/2022 3:18:51 AM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

The Trump-led GOP underperformed in 2022.

The Trump-led GOP was a catastrophe in 2022 when you consider that Biden has an approval rating of 27% with independents. Those independents think the nation is on the wrong track by 72%.

By any historical measure, this should have been a wave election.

Instead, it was a fizzle because Trump and his picked leader of the party, Ronna McDaniel, changed nothing after 2020 where we first saw the effects of ballot harvesting.

2022 should have been nationalized and turned into a referendum about Biden.

Those independents who hated Biden? They broke 49-49% for the Democrats.


18 posted on 11/16/2022 3:22:49 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (We are being manipulated by forces that most do not see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

19 posted on 11/16/2022 3:29:07 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true . . . I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
Here’s the breakdown:

Governor – 9/18 = 50% Senate – 13/18 = 72% House – 97/119 = 81%

Trump is trying to take credit for the safe bet races of people like Rubio, Grassley, and Rand Paul when he talks about his "93% winning endorsements!" but the real test is how did Trump's picks do in the swing states he lost in 2020 but will need to win in 2024 if he wants to have a shot?

Let's take a look:

Governors:

Lombardo: W
Lake: L
Mastriano: L
Michels: L
Dixon: L
Perdue: L

Senate:

Johnson: W
Walker: RO
Masters: L
Oz: L
Laxalt: L
Bolduc: L

Secretaries of State:

Finchem: L
Karamo: L
Marchant: L
Hice: L

These are the states Trump needs to win and nobody was buying what he was selling.

20 posted on 11/16/2022 3:42:27 AM PST by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson