Posted on 11/13/2022 10:42:29 AM PST by Macho MAGA Man
Maggie Hassan had an amazing night on Tuesday. The unpopular Democrat Senator routed her Republican opponent. She had such a good night that she won 1,100 votes in a community with a population under 700.
It was another Democrat miracle!
Granite Glok reported:
We’ve got something for you if you’re looking for irregularities in your local elections. Columbia, New Hampshire. It’s way up north. A tiny little town that, according to the 2020 US Census, had 695 residents. But according to the Secretary of State, Maggie Hassan received 1,106 votes from the same town.
Don Bolduc had 193 votes.
The State Website reports Columbia, NH, had 735 residents in 2019. Columbia, NH’s website says the population in 2010 was 798. Wikipedia cites a decline based on the 2020 census to 695.
How were over 1300 votes cast in a town with a population under 700 at least and under 800 at best?
Someone up there might want to request the same-day registration list. Your town doubled in size overnight.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Oh no this is definitely a messaging issue. /sarc
Zip it election denier! Amazing ain’t it? The DOH-j......crickets.
Well, inflation is high so...population inflation is too?
What is the problem?—the purpose of “democracy” was for Democrats to cheat and win.
I guess you didn’t get the memo.
;-)
Nothing to see here...move along 🙄
Exactly. lol I’m sure the talking heads on our side will overanalyze this particular result and say it was a backlash to Trump and the Dobbs decision.
Except it was a typo. From the original report:
The Democrats are dead serious about politics.
They feel that controlling elections benefits them financially.
ALL Democrats feel that way.
They will lie, cheat, steal, and with the Clintons, kill to win elections.
hassan | |||||||||||||
minus | |||||||||||||
Coos County | Messner, r | Shaheen, d | O'Donnell, l | Scatter | Coos County | Bolduc, r | Hassan, d | Kauffman, l | Scatter | shaheen | |||
At. & Gil. Academy Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | At. & Gil. Academy Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Bean's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Bean's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Bean's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Bean's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Berlin | 1475 | 2430 | 122 | 0 | Berlin | 1328 | 1589 | 83 | 0 | -841 | 153% | ||
Cambridge | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Cambridge | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 300% | ||
Carroll | 228 | 300 | 8 | 0 | Carroll | 200 | 217 | 10 | 0 | -83 | 138% | ||
Chandler's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Chandler's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Clarksville | 93 | 80 | 6 | 0 | Clarksville | 89 | 62 | 6 | 1 | -18 | 129% | ||
Colebrook | 556 | 475 | 19 | 0 | Colebrook | 515 | 341 | 26 | 1 | -134 | 139% | ||
Columbia | 198 | 148 | 8 | 0 | Columbia | 193 | 1106 | 4 | 0 | 958 | 13% | ||
Crawford's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Crawford's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Cutt's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Cutt's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Dalton | 258 | 265 | 13 | 0 | Dalton | 233 | 215 | 10 | 0 | -50 | 123% | ||
Dix's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Dix's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Dixville | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Dixville | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 80% | ||
Dummer | 94 | 82 | 6 | 0 | Dummer | 80 | 50 | 3 | 0 | -32 | 164% | ||
Errol | 131 | 79 | 2 | 0 | Errol | 116 | 63 | 2 | 0 | -16 | 125% | ||
Erving's Location | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Erving's Location | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Gorham | 616 | 1012 | 37 | 0 | Gorham | 532 | 733 | 21 | 2 | -279 | 138% | ||
Green's Grant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Green's Grant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
Hadley's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Hadley's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Jefferson | 331 | 302 | 16 | 0 | Jefferson | 328 | 201 | 10 | 0 | -101 | 150% | ||
Kilkenny | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Kilkenny | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Lancaster | 767 | 901 | 40 | 0 | Lancaster | 616 | 608 | 63 | 0 | -293 | 148% | ||
Low & Burbank's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low & Burbank's Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Martin's Location | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Martin's Location | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Milan | 364 | 420 | 11 | 0 | Milan | 322 | 276 | 16 | 1 | -144 | 152% | ||
Millsfield* | 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | Millsfield | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 175% | ||
Northumberland | 504 | 516 | 15 | 0 | Northumberland | 416 | 318 | 18 | 2 | -198 | 162% | ||
Odell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Odell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Pinkham's Grant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Pinkham's Grant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
Pittsburg | 340 | 192 | 3 | 0 | Pittsburg | 317 | 146 | 7 | 0 | -46 | 132% | ||
Randolph | 74 | 200 | 1 | 0 | Randolph | 67 | 170 | 4 | 0 | -30 | 118% | ||
Sargent's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Sargent's Purchase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Second College Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Second College Grant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Shelburne | 108 | 137 | 4 | 0 | Shelburne | 115 | 107 | 3 | 0 | -30 | 128% | ||
Stark | 148 | 135 | 7 | 0 | Stark | 161 | 86 | 5 | 0 | -49 | 157% | ||
Stewartstown | 234 | 155 | 7 | 0 | Stewartstown | 212 | 83 | 6 | 0 | -72 | 187% | ||
Stratford | 120 | 172 | 7 | 0 | Stratford | 119 | 124 | 8 | 0 | -48 | 139% | ||
Success | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Success | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Thompson & Meserve's Pur. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Thompson & Meserve's Pur. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | ||
Wentworth's Location | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Wentworth's Location | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 67% | ||
Whitefield | 549 | 731 | 30 | 0 | Whitefield | 504 | 546 | 39 | 1 | -185 | 134% | ||
TOTALS | 7,222 | 8,752 | 362 | - | TOTALS | 6,491 | 7,059 | 345 | 8 |
Hancock in Hillsborough county also has “issues”.
They’re rubbing our face in it knowing we can’t do a thing about it.
“typo”
It is part of this new artificial intelligence thingy—”typos” all go the Democrats.
I vaguely remember a town that gave the hilterbest 1,500 votes with 100 Registered voters.
That would mean the Democrats only manufactured 157% of the vote plus more for every voter from the locality who voted other than Democrat.
Make that 57% instead of 157%.
Expecting a possible visit from "friendly" federal and state law enforcement agencies, New Hampshire patriots need to diplomatically demand that the FBI start doing its job to investigate possible Election Day violations of the wrongly ignored Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A) imo. Section 2 is a penalty for rigged elections.
Excerpted from 14A:
"Section 2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State." [Section 2: Apportionment of Representatives]
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Insights welcome.
From a person who works the polls in New Hampshire, the reason: same day registration. Details later.
How big is the cemetery?
NH has disappointed us for decades.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.