I had the impression Oz was a friend of his and that’s all he cared about.
It was a bone head endorsement. Either of the other two candidates would of been better. I’m not confident they would win but they would have been better.
“I have the best people.”
The hell you do!
Yes we could have had a wholly owned CCP establishment type or a candidate whose only claim to fame was she was a child of rape.
You cannot put this at the feet of the candidate who ends up running an overall good campaign including an obvious big win in a debate against a vegetable. No matter how good the others may have been over Oz, they would’ve also lost to the vegetable. Either you’ve got a major fraud problem in Pennsylvania or you’ve got an immense amount of idiot voters who didn’t want to be outdone by the idiots in NY. Most of my money is on fraud, but I will not totally discount idiocy.
Saying that the others would’ve been better but probably still would’ve lost means that the endorsement isn’t the problem. If I do have a frustration with President Trump it’s over this foolish announcement for next Tuesday because I think that was far too prominent and took some of the focus off yesterday .