You cannot put this at the feet of the candidate who ends up running an overall good campaign including an obvious big win in a debate against a vegetable. No matter how good the others may have been over Oz, they would’ve also lost to the vegetable. Either you’ve got a major fraud problem in Pennsylvania or you’ve got an immense amount of idiot voters who didn’t want to be outdone by the idiots in NY. Most of my money is on fraud, but I will not totally discount idiocy.
Saying that the others would’ve been better but probably still would’ve lost means that the endorsement isn’t the problem. If I do have a frustration with President Trump it’s over this foolish announcement for next Tuesday because I think that was far too prominent and took some of the focus off yesterday .
Debates don’t matter, branding does. Oz had huge negatives coming into the state. His recent leftist postions are all on video, supporting child mutilation, supporting Roe and being Oprahs quack doctor pal.
Commercials showed Oz like a used car saleman and Fetterman like an ordinary Joe. It’s a lie of course.
All this in a state where the Republican party is in bed with the Democrats (why there’s massive voter fraud) and it only takes plurality of votes to get the nomination. The only reason he won the nomination is because of Trumps endorsement.
By saying the others would be better, I’m saying the Republican party would be better off being the conservative party (Barnette) instead of the Democrat lite party or having a nominee with fewer negatives (McCormick).