[marktwain]

The article makes is sound as if a connection between Constitutional Carry and more violence has been discovered.

But only anecdotal evidence is given, and it is contradictory.

[ConservativeInPA]

Random? No, it’s intentional.

[230FMJ]

What about Random Hammer Violence?

[FlingWingFlyer]

I don’t know anything about “random gun violence” but it sounds like random stupidity is up at the New Yawk Slimes.

[T.B. Yoits]

Ah, yes, more propaganda from the Leftists at the New York Times.

There is no such thing as "gun violence". It's criminal violence.

There's nothing random about it; it's very intentional both in Democrat's insidious support of it and in those who are targeted by such criminals.

[bert]

What harms America most?

Gun violence or the New York Times?

[FlingWingFlyer]

In Texas, it isn’t an “armed public” that the police are “facing”, it’s a reduction in the number of criminals walking the streets.

[A_perfect_lady]

Under a Democrat president, with Democrats controlling the House and the Senate? In cities all under Democrat control? Gun violence is up? Hmp. Well. That’s certainly odd.

[SoConPubbie]

No lie is too big for the NY Tinrs!

[BitWielder1]

So a criminal shooting an innocent is now attributed to Constitutional Carry, even though he would have done it anyway.
It's like attributing drunk driving to cars, not the drunks.
But hey, the Left does this all the time.

[bk1000]

Wait until the diesel runs out and the grocery store shelves mysteriously go empty.

[LuxAerterna]

There’s nothing “random” about cashless bail, defund the police, “sanctuary” for criminal aliens, or Soros prosecutors. Anyone with an atom of common sense knows exactly what’s the inevitable upshot.

[ExTxMarine]

If guns are out, just randomly, violently attacking people, we need to get that under control!

Otherwise, SHUT THE H@LL UP New York Slimes!!