>>this dog’s breakfast of a complaint
A comment I saw about the press conference announcing this, was that there were a lot of people standing around behind her, whose body language said they really didn’t want to be there.
Take that as you will.
The specifics of the case probably sounded so much better inside her own head. Now that the charges are out in the open, they may be examined and the true motives revealed.
Envy and prejudice make for poor law.
A comment I saw about the press conference announcing this, was that there were a lot of people standing around behind her, whose body language said they really didn’t want to be there.
The pictures I have seen are pretty much standard for the crazies.
The people standing behind her looked like ghouls. The expressions on their faces would go well with torture, a burning of Joan of Arc at the stake, etc.
They can still go to prison with her.
Replying to @KurtSchlichter
only skimmed for parts for
<><>damages allegations, ones against NY, AND the plaintiff....that are absent.
You cannot sue if you did not suffer a loss. None are pleaded in the parts I looked at.
Not only is there no damage, but as I remarked on an earlier thread if Trump inflated the value of his real estate holdings, then he OVER PAID his property tax. Thus, he BENEFITED NYC and all the tax payers of NYC.