Posted on 09/12/2022 10:58:03 AM PDT by Starman417
No one has to tell you about the Jan 6 protest. However, there was absolutely no chance the protest was going to change a thing whether they were able to stop the count or not. I know no one who would ever take it seriously. The big lie from the left is that somehow it would have changed the outcome of the 2020 election. It would not have and no one in their right mind would suggest otherwise.
But there was another, quieter conspiracy insurrection that was far more devious and evil and it succeeded. In the end, it changed the outcome of the 2020 election. The velvet insurrection.
The conspirators
Hillary Clinton
Conceived the Russian collusion plot and paid to have it spread.
Peter Strzok
Opened Crossfire Hurricane to investigate Trump without a predicate.
Jake Sullivan
Spread the Alfa Bank lie
This miserable liar is now National Security Advisor to Biden.
In mid-November 2016, it enlisted top Justice Department official Bruce Ohr – whose wife, Nellie, worked for Fusion GPS – to add credibility to the Alfa rumors. That month, Ohr advised the FBI that Steele had told him that the Alfa Bank server was a link to the Trump campaign. Then in early December, Ohr met with the FBI case supervisor who worked for Strzok at least twice. Declassified notes and other records show that during those meetings, Ohr provided him with thumb drives he had received from paid Clinton opposition researcher and Fusion GPS co-founder, Glenn Simpson, and Ohr’s wife and Simpson’s colleague, Nellie. Quoting his Clinton sources, Ohr insisted the alleged backdoor computer channel between Trump and Alfa was real.Obama, Biden and Comey
They met to conspire against Trump under the guise of protecting the US
January 5: Yates, Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper briefed Obama on Russia-related matters in the Oval Office. Biden and Rice also attended. After the Obama briefing, the intelligence chiefs who would be leaving at the end of the term were dismissed and Yates and Comey, who would continue in the Trump administration, were asked to stay. Not only did Obama give his guidance about how to perpetuate the Russia collusion theory investigations, he also talked about Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to both Comey and Yates. Interestingly, Clapper, Comey, and Yates all said that they did not brief Obama about these phone calls. Clapper testified he did not brief Obama on the calls, Yates learned about the calls from Obama himself during that meeting, and Comey also testified he didn’t brief Obama about the calls, even though the intelligence was an FBI product. Rice, who publicly lied but later admitted under oath to her widespread use of unmasked intelligence at the end of the Obama administration, likely briefed Obama on the calls and would have had access to the intelligence. Comey mentions the Logan Act at this meeting.Susan Rice
Obama, the memo claims, stressed that “every aspect of this issue” be handled “by the book” and then “reiterated” that law enforcement proceed “by the book.” Comey “affirmed” he’s “proceeding ‘by the book.’ ” That’s right: She used the term three times.James ComeyCould a note scream “cover your butt” any louder? Why would lawyers want a document created, two weeks after the fact and at the very last minute, that purported to show the Russia probe was totally kosher?
Surely because they feared people would think otherwise, because the probe wasn’t.
We now know, in fact, that nothing about that investigation was handled ethically.
On January 6 Comey asks for a meeting with Trump which at its heart was to let Trump know Comey had dirt on Trump
Comey let Trump think he was not personally under investigation. What Comey apparently did not tell Trump was that two months previously he signed off on a FISA application using that “salacious and unverified” dossier largely as the basis for the warrant. It also appears that the FBI did not inform Trump of the FISA Court that the dossier was unverified and was paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Unverified information is not supposed to part of a FISA request.Comey knew it was a lie.
The FBI deceived the House, Senate and the Justice Department about the substance and strength of evidence undergirding its counterintelligence investigation of President Trump, according to a recently declassified document and other material.Comey leaked classified information to in hopes of seeing a Special Prosecutor to persecute Trump.A seven-page internal FBI memo dated March 8, 2017, shows that "talking points" prepared for then-FBI Director James Comey for his meeting the next day with the congressional leadership were riddled with half-truths, outright falsehoods, and critical omissions. Both the Senate and the House opened investigations and held hearings based in part on the misrepresentations made in those FBI briefings, one of which was held in the Senate that morning and the other in the House later that afternoon. RealClearInvestigations reached out to every member of the leadership, sometimes known as the "Gang of Eight." Some declined to comment, while others did not respond to queries.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Bttt.
5.56mm
the farther we get from the jan 6th truth, the more the left’s narrative becomes believable...
https://rumble.com/v181401-january-6th-rally-2021.html
my jan 6th rally footage on rumble.
was evacuation astaged overreaction
Oh, there WAS an insurrection, and damned few are talking about it. Joe Biden in office is the proof of its success.
Notice the new narrative being pushed by weak Republicans? The 2020 election was rigged, not stolen.
Don’t fall for it. This is being pushed by weak Republicans who are embarrassed by claims that the election was stolen, but yet want to appease MAGA supporters.
These milquetoasts don’t want the Left to call them “election deniers”, so they have come up with a way to express regret over 2020 without offending Democrats.
With this recent rash of articles the weak GOP establishment tries to explain that Trump lost for various reasons that were unfair… but not quite illegal.
Some examples: The Hunter Biden laptop scandal was unfairly suppressed in the weeks before the election. The Russia impeachment and investigations unfairly damaged Trump’s public image. Covid unfairly hurt Trump’s election year economy.
Folks, those unfair things did happen, but they can’t be the explanation for why Trump lost - because he DIDN’T lose!
The 2020 election was stolen, and politicians like Trump, Mastriano, Lake, MTG, and sadly - very few others - who have the balls to confront this profound corruption, should be applauded, not shunned.
Others like OZ, who do not even dare to say it was stolen….. I truly wish them luck against their Democrat opponents and I sincerely hope they win…
But I must say, any Republican candidate who is afraid to even talk about the crime of the century - a crime that was perpetrated against his own party - that’s not a politician who is off to a very good start.
They were illegal.
But the Left had put in place the judges and legal teams to delay and obfuscate until the stolen election was a done deal, supported by the dominant media, the Tech oligarchs, and the Deep state intelligence networks.
All of that was supported by the left mobilizing and ready to take to the streets with 700 violent protests, if the election were not called for them.
“They were illegal.”
I know - that’s my whole point - that’s why I called the stolen election the crime of the century.
The theft of the election was illegal - the government coverups were illegal - much of the media censorship and cancelling was illegal - the political arrests and imprisonments were illegal.
But many cowardly Republicans - even on FR - don’t want to talk about the illegality - because it would expose their complicity and their failure to do anything about it.
So they shift attention to the unfairness and lack of objectivity of the media.
That was my point.
The pitiful number of posts to this thread reflects our disillusionment with the central feature of our once republic: the rule of law.
I disagree.
It is a pitiful thread deserving of no attention other than a rebuke.
The article is another attempt to distract from the high crimes of election theft, speech suppression and political arrests and imprisonment - and divert attention to reasons why Trump supposedly “lost”.
The ONLY reason they are paying lip-service to the idea that the 2020 election was unfairly influenced by media and security state bias - is so that they can avoid talking about the crime of the century: the STOLEN 2020 election and the murder and imprisonment of those who protested it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.