ransomnote wrote: “CDC isn’t a good source of info. It’s their hides they’re covering.”
So, only sources that support the anti-vaxxer narrative are ‘good’ sources?
“As Kirsch has gone deeper into the anti-vaccine scene, many professional associates have increasingly distanced themselves from him. In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior. Over the summer, the conflict reached his most recent startup, M10. Its board told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements. In September, he resigned as CEO and gave up his board seat.”
You're projecting, troll.
You post sources known to be corrupt and then post MSM smear jobs on Kirsch. Kirsch cites the work of doctors and statisticians but you keep focusing on him because the ‘fact check’ censorship wing of the MSM has already done write ups on him for trolls to use.
The same people pretending to be ‘alarmed’ by Kirsch are the ones claiming Trump grabbed the wheel from the Secret Service.
The CDC is weaponized - I guess you haven’t been around for the past 3 years so you didn’t know it. Write it down so you don’t forget.
Looking at the data, there is the spike of deaths in September even from a crud info resource like CDC.
Yep. Your government masters had their chance and they blew it. Once credibility and trust is lost, it's lost forever. You shold know that from personal experience.