Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: whyilovetexas111

A picture of a intermediate range ballistic missile impact on an outline of a carrier in the Gobi Desert.

China claims this means they can take on the U.S. Navy.

The Navy is between amused and confused, not worried.

13 posted on 08/28/2022 2:56:37 PM PDT by Widget Jr (Disobey your television.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Widget Jr

“A picture of a intermediate range ballistic missile impact on an outline of a carrier in the Gobi Desert.

China claims this means they can take on the U.S. Navy.

The Navy is between amused and confused, not worried”.

How does the US Navy protect a carrier from an intermediate range ballistic missile?


14 posted on 08/28/2022 3:06:12 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr
The Navy is between amused and confused, not worried.

You know this how?

In REALITY, the US Navy, Army and Air Force are VERY concerned about China's military capabilities. They know a LOT more than some guy posting on the Internet.

One YUGE issue about using ballistic missiles as a nuclear power, even with conventional warheads, is how does those being targeted know that?

They don't.

We have built a world-wide and space network of sensors that let us know immediately when a ballistic missile is fired.

How do we know one or two such missiles are not going to be followed by a mass attack?

We don't.

So if we allow a nuclear power to launch an attack on us without releasing our own nuclear missiles our missiles will be destroyed in their own silos.

We have about 10-15 minutes to decide to launch ours or lose them. It is our strategy to fire on first launch.

OTHERWISE, we are encouraging an enemy to launch a few at a us, like we did when we put all our battleships and carriers in Pearl Harbor in 1941.

Imagine if we were able to see the Imperial Japanese Navy fleet of 6 carriers coming to the Northwest of Hawaii the first week of December 1941, and we let them know we saw them. They'd probably hold up. It had to be a surprise without any ability of the US to find them and fight back before they attacked.

That's what Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) is really all about.

15 posted on 08/28/2022 3:12:41 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

Imagine a hit like that on a nuclear carrier in port.

I would bet the US Navy is VERY concerned about their ability to do that. The ship would be a harder target at sea, but still......


16 posted on 08/28/2022 3:26:36 PM PDT by GaltMeister (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr
“The Navy is between amused and confused, not worried. “

Could be a fatal mistake for alot of good men.

27 posted on 08/28/2022 4:37:35 PM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

Russia also has ballistic missiles that can sink carriers.


38 posted on 08/28/2022 4:56:08 PM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson