Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Picture Is How China Plans To Beat America If World War III Breaks Out
19FortyFive ^ | 8/28/2022 | Peter Suciu

Posted on 08/28/2022 1:59:53 PM PDT by whyilovetexas111

In the last couple of years, there has been a lot of attention on the build-up of China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). It has undergone a major modernization effort and is now the largest naval force in the world. Just last month, the PLAN launched its third aircraft carrier – the second to be entirely indigenously built. This will allow China to flex its muscles in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond.

Likewise, there has been great speculation regarding China’s efforts to develop a capable fifth-generation fighter aircraft and a medium- to long-range stealth bomber. In very short order, Beijing has finally made the great leap forward to become a major world power.

(Excerpt) Read more at 19fortyfive.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: 19fortyfiveiscrap; aircraftcarriers; australia; blogpimp; blogspam; ccp; china; concerntroll; concerntrolls; crapblog; petersuciu; solomonislands; suciusux; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: eekitsagreek

btt


21 posted on 08/28/2022 4:18:09 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Sometimes when you get to where you're supposed to be, it's too soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: laplata
How does the US Navy protect a carrier from an intermediate range ballistic missile?

By not sitting still.

This supersonic weapon can kill a soldier from 400 yards and only costs $.30 each!!!!!.


22 posted on 08/28/2022 4:19:07 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

Very good point, and I know and agree.

If the Chinese use nukes on ANY of our forces, whether it be carriers, Navy flotillas at sea, Guam, Okinawa, etc., there will be a nuclear response.

To not respond with nukes would give the enemy the idea that we no longer will use MAD, and they may be free to nuke us more, and even win a nuclear war.

No one can. That’s the point. THEY have to calculate that.

BTW, we long ago gave up demolishing cities only. Leadership is the highest priority.

Dig your way out of thousands of tons of radioactive rubble, Mr. Xi, if you make it. Or better, think before you press go.


23 posted on 08/28/2022 4:25:42 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

They really don’t have to use nukes - a kinetic mass of moderate size hitting a ship at hypersonic speed would disable the ship at the very least.


24 posted on 08/28/2022 4:31:18 PM PDT by GaltMeister (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

How do you hide a carrier that is in the middle of air operations? Planes landing and taking off.....


25 posted on 08/28/2022 4:31:56 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Good post.


26 posted on 08/28/2022 4:33:14 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr
“The Navy is between amused and confused, not worried. “

Could be a fatal mistake for alot of good men.

27 posted on 08/28/2022 4:37:35 PM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That is a very poor analogy.


28 posted on 08/28/2022 4:39:22 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Then there’s the issue of battlefield tactical nukes.


29 posted on 08/28/2022 4:39:39 PM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eekitsagreek
God help the US if we go to war with China.

True. But... Here's the problem for China.

Notice all the critical straits Chinese produced goods have to be shipped through. Oil and food come back. Every one of those checkpoints we have the ability to gain and hold, even at the same time. China's growing Navy doesn't have expeditionary, blue water forces, yet.

You can't eat iPhones, plastic ware, TVs and appliances.

Basically, they import food and export nice things everybody wants.

The USA would have a critical component disaster, to include medicines and medical supplies. However, we do have the ability to make stuff here, it's just so much cheaper to make stuff in China and ship it here.

A billion people get mighty hungry. And modern economies need oil, and China still gets most of theirs from sea.

Lastly, the Chinese do NOT have a blue water Navy, nor the ability to project power beyond 1000 miles from their coast. I've already explained the risk they take if they use ballistic missiles, with nukes or conventional warheads.

How long will last I do not know, but currently, only the US has the forces, men and materials to invade another country over sea and land. Tawain is doable for the PLA, but not if we and the Japanese intervene.

30 posted on 08/28/2022 4:40:12 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Yup.

I think battlefield nukes will always escalate to full on nuke war.


31 posted on 08/28/2022 4:41:08 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Maybe we should just premptively scuttle all of our CVNs now and use the money for more gender study scholarships.


32 posted on 08/28/2022 4:41:35 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

“Weather can hide from satellites”

Does it play peekeboo?


33 posted on 08/28/2022 4:44:53 PM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

“The Navy has been addressing how to defend carriers from nuclear attack since Bikini Atoll nuclear tests. Those were over seventy years ago. “

So? They never did find a solution.


34 posted on 08/28/2022 4:45:24 PM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

In other news, our Navy fielded laser point-defense weapons.


35 posted on 08/28/2022 4:51:59 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Maybe we should just premptively scuttle all of our CVNs now and use the money for more gender study scholarships”.

At the rate we’re going under the evil bastards in power, that is a probability sooner than we realize.


36 posted on 08/28/2022 4:52:05 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111
"This Picture Is How China Plans To Beat America"

https://www.amacad.org/publication/perils-of-complacency/section/5


37 posted on 08/28/2022 4:53:12 PM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

Russia also has ballistic missiles that can sink carriers.


38 posted on 08/28/2022 4:56:08 PM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Do you have a reference for that claim?


39 posted on 08/28/2022 4:56:55 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Acts 17


40 posted on 08/28/2022 4:58:01 PM PDT by Varsity Flight ( "War by the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite prayer warriors. 10.5.6.5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson