Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd

There is more than enough vaxx gloom in Pfizer’s own documents. One doesn’t need a substack.

Maybe instead of skipping over those threads, go inside, and refute Pfizer’s own studies.


58 posted on 08/26/2022 1:18:57 PM PDT by roving ( Pronouns- libs/suk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: roving

So you’ve been through the thousands of pages of the Pfizer trials that have been released so far yourself? Why don’t you post your analysis?

Or are you relying on Naomi Wolfe and her “crowdsourced project” so full of such ridiculous and glaring errors others (including other vax doomers) called her out on them and one of her “researchers” had to note it on her website?

One of those who called her out on her errors, was this guy, who provides the pages and tables so you can see for yourself:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html

For more, see:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=200#200

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=198#198

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=247#247

There are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the vaccines. I am not vaccinated myself and am firmly against mandates. All this crazy fake garbage obscures the valid reasons and hurts the anti-mandate cause. I am interested in facts and the truth. These vax doomer blogs are very, very short on both and very, very long on scaremongering, bad math, bad science and grifting.


60 posted on 08/26/2022 2:03:45 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson