We won't know what really happened on Jan 6 until Ray Epps testifies under oath

Flopping Aces ^ | 06-30-22 | DrJohn

[Starman417]

The Jan 6 committee is and has always been an echo chamber. It is a one sided highly partisan exercise that is entirely absent context. It's been a non-stop spewing of hearsay and innuendo which has been seized upon by the media, much to their detriment. The truth is escaping bit by bit despite being locked in a democrat chokehold.

Cassidy Hutchinson offered essentially nothing but hearsay and was found twice to be mendacious. The account she gave of the alleged "lunging" simply could not have happened as she relayed it. She was not the author of the note as she asserted. Normally that be enough to impeach a witness completely, but the committee is digging in its heels and unwilling to accept rebuttals. Dan Bongino (a former Secret Service Agent in presidential protection for Bush and Obama) does a good job of fisking Hutchinson's account.

• Twice Hutchinson said the President "said something to the effect of..." One of those times was in reference to Trump and the weapons and magnetometers. She said at first that she was part of the conversation and then immediately changed that to being "in the vicinity" of the conversation. Trump wanted the magnetometers removed. According to Bongino all Presidents want the Ellipse packed and all complain about the magnetometers because it slows the entry rate. It would have been fun to have Jim Jordan or Jum Banks ask some pointed questions cross examining her.
• Hutchinson said Ornato referred to "the beast." Bongino notes that no one in the Secret Service calls it "the beast." It's referred to "the parades" or the "limo."
• Trump did not enter "the beast." He got into an SUV called the "camp David package."
• There was a third agent between Trump and Engel and Ornato in the front seat. Trump would have had to get by him first before getting to Engel.

That pretty much devastates Hutchinson's account.

Were this a legitimate investigation there would be a number of people who should be subpoenaed to testify. Ornato and Engel were not asked to testify under oath and have indicated a willingness to do so. If the Jan 6 committee refuses to call on them to publicly testify the charade is over. But there is someone else who absolutely should be subpoenaed to testify in public.

Ray Epps.

Epps was part of the initial Capitol breach

https://wapo.st/3Kk99yO

Ray Epps exhorted protesters to enter the Capitol

https://youtu.be/IPoS1RbpJDI

"We need to go into the Capitol"

Epps was #16 on a list of people the feds wanted to identify but was curiously dropped from the list.

[FreeReign]

As if being under oath will make a difference. See Cassidy Hutchinson. Epps can lie and get away with it if it’s for the benefit of the Liberal World Order.

[cuz1961]

If Epps was working for the left, no way Will he tell,the truth. Cassidy lied under oath, he wil, too most likely
/\
\/

True.

But.

The value is showing the liars lies in all its lying glory to a nation that can then see how much lying the liars lie.

So progs, lie on, publicly,

it just digs your. integrity and credability graves deeper.

.

[Bob434]

[[The value is showing the liars lies in all its lying glory to a nation that can then see how much lying the liars lie.]]

True- but you can bet it will be carefully orchestrated to try to prevent another cassidy event- the problem is that conservatives dont get to question- or even present evidence counter to the show trial’s false accusations

[cuz1961]

the problem is that conservatives dont get to question- or even present evidence counter to the show trial’s false accusations

/\
\/

True.

But that ends up dual use too

Americans are good at smelling the rat crap a mile off.

The progs are loseing the credibility war,,,, which is why they are pushing for global war so hard, to cut us off at the pass before we can boot their asses back to the utopia fantasyland closet where they can abuse no one except themselves in their emotional and masturbatory nirvana.

[glimmerman70]

They will maybe hit his magic number and get him to testify against Trump. Not sure if he was pro Trump or a paid actor..

[Chewbarkah]

Epps is wearing a TRUMP hat in the posted pic. Has anyone located older photos of Epps wearing Trump gear? Did he support Trump so visibly before the primaries and the election? How about in the 2016 election? What’s his voting and donating history?

[Miguk]

"Testifying under oath," is not the same as held accountable or punished (in any way, shape or form), for "lying under oath."

Soviet Show Trial gotta Soviet Show Trial

[mass55th]

Under oath is just another term for being able to lie with impunity if you’re an FBI/DOJ asset, and/or witness, testifying for the Democrats.

[higgmeister]

They will maybe hit his magic number and get him to testify against Trump. Not sure if he was pro Trump or a paid actor..

The whole thing is, if he was a Trump fan he would be and would have, this past year, been in jail to this very minute.

No lies could explain why he was released with no charges when he was the clearly a ring leader instigator.

Ray Epps could only answer for his role in setting up the government conspiracy.

[GingisK]

Why would anyone think that he would tell the truth under ant circumstances?

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

And you still won’t know because he will lie like a rug. You think oaths mean anything to these people? He knows there will be no consequences.