Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Happy 40th Birthday to Wrath of Khan, The Film That Saved Star Trek
Gizmodo ^ | June 4, 2022 | Justin Carter

Posted on 06/11/2022 7:35:03 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

Star Trek is no stranger to cinema, and the franchise’s quality of films tends to fluctuate with each new release. We’ve seen plenty of pretty good films from the series, and we’ve also seen films that weren’t as good as they could’ve been. Everyone’s got their own favorites, but if there’s one thing that can be agreed upon, it’s that Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan stands above the rest.

Released exactly today in 1982, Khan served as a sequel to both the original 1979 Star Trek film, and the 1967 episode, “Space Seed.” Directed by Nicholas Meyer, who also did uncredited work on its final script with Jack B. Sowards, the film has cast a long shadow over Star Trek. Whether it was due to the shocking death of Spock (Leonard Nimoy), its substantially improved acting, or having a great villain in the form of the late Ricardo Montalban as Khan Noonien Singh, Khan the film was nothing short of a success back in the day. At the time of its release, it came out to strong reviews and was a box office hit, earning $97 million worldwide. Even beyond financials, it spawned a brief sub-franchise for the film franchise, kicking off a trilogy that included 1984's Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, and 1986's Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. And it’s why, at least prior to the 2009 reboot, the Trek fandom held to the belief that even-numbered entries would be the only good films in the series.

(Excerpt) Read more at gizmodo.com ...


TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: movies; ricardomontalbhan; startrek; williamshatner; wrathofkhan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Macho MAGA Man

That is my favorite of all Star Trek movies.

Most excellently done!


41 posted on 06/11/2022 8:34:49 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Link to full story.

-PJ

42 posted on 06/11/2022 8:43:37 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunny bonobo

You’re correct about everything in your post.


43 posted on 06/11/2022 8:45:00 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

44 posted on 06/11/2022 8:46:46 PM PDT by Kenny Bania (Ovaltine? Why not call it Roundtine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

The Trouble with Tribbles spawned my favorite Star Trek:TOS episode I,Mudd. “Harcort Fenton Mudd!”


45 posted on 06/11/2022 8:59:29 PM PDT by ResponseAbility (-The truth of liberalism is the stupid can feel smart, the lazy entitled, and the immoral unashamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

“De plane!” “De plane!”🤣


46 posted on 06/11/2022 9:08:13 PM PDT by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ResponseAbility
The earlier episode, "Mudd's Women", introduced the Harry Mudd character. "The Trouble With Tribbles" featured a similar character actor... you may remember him from an episode of Lost in Space, too:

Episode: "The Great Vegetable Rebellion". Ah, the 1960s.

47 posted on 06/11/2022 9:13:35 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: algore

🤣 loved that movie.


48 posted on 06/11/2022 9:20:58 PM PDT by M_Continuum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I liked “ Star Trek: The Motion Picture” as the best one, too. The musical score, the special effects, and we are seeing the original cast for the first time in years.
The “V-Ger” angle threw me for a loop- I didn’t see “Voyager” coming for anything. And Persis Khambatta was striking.
It is a great movie, and “The Wrath of Kahn” was no slouch.
Ricardo Montalban made that movie, he was fantastic.
The entire series was great.


49 posted on 06/11/2022 9:33:05 PM PDT by telescope115 (Proud member of the ANTIFAuci movement. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

Kirk: Still, “old friend”! You’ve managed to kill just about everyone else, but like a poor marksman, you keep missing the target!


50 posted on 06/11/2022 9:38:32 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("It's one thing if it's a minor incursion" - Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The music was pretty good in the tv series.

Star Trek The Danish National Symphony Orchestra (Live)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfwiy9JQ-PI

Star Trek background music. [360p]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWAX6_pnnUQ

Star Trek TOS super soundtrack suite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZAciWLfWPM

Star Trek romance music [360p]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQKUS7cQPZc


51 posted on 06/11/2022 10:06:05 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

Wrath of Khan was number one!


52 posted on 06/11/2022 11:55:10 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Thanks for the clarification. I can visually recognize the difference from memory without having to review any footage.


53 posted on 06/12/2022 12:22:40 AM PDT by ResponseAbility (-The truth of liberalism is the stupid can feel smart, the lazy entitled, and the immoral unashamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ResponseAbility

So...were Decker and Ilea the beginning of the borg?


54 posted on 06/12/2022 12:36:52 AM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Star Trek - Born Again Trek - Julia Ecklar
https://youtu.be/vARV4JXK3R0


55 posted on 06/12/2022 12:42:45 AM PDT by mairdie (Star Trek - Born Again Trek - Julia Ecklar - https://youtu.be/vARV4JXK3R0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

The line said by Kirk’s son of “He cheated” is the line that has always stood out for me. I guess that is because cheating to win was such a bad thing to me when I was a kid. Now I know cheating is almost necessary to win in the adult world.


56 posted on 06/12/2022 2:33:47 AM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Great movie but I still like Star Trek: The Motionless Picture, especially the recent updated directors edition that has been rereleased in movie theaters recently.

I say that as a 55-year fan of Star Trek.

Regards,

57 posted on 06/12/2022 2:50:26 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

They were both about whales. TWOK was better because it was about hunting whales not singing to them.


58 posted on 06/12/2022 2:52:04 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
Strangely enough Chekhov was not in the TV episode.

That's because the character of "Chekhov" was not even a twinkle in Gene Rodenberry's eye at the time of the filming of that episode.

Walter Koenig was hired only some time later.

Regards,

59 posted on 06/12/2022 2:52:58 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
he said that when he saw that at least other characters were always talking about the character, he was somewhat mollified

Ah, yes: The "Mr. Wong" effect, as Orson Welles called it!

Regards,

60 posted on 06/12/2022 2:55:06 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson