Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security: Whistling Past The $96 Trillion Graveyard
Zubu Brothers ^ | 6-10-2022 | Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com

Posted on 06/10/2022 9:39:36 AM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 06/10/2022 9:39:36 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Imagine if the past 60+ million workers hadn’t been aborted.


2 posted on 06/10/2022 9:45:06 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What will Fed.gov do? More of the same.

Ever higher taxes, more debt, more money printing, more central control, more political division, propaganda and demonization to fight against an increasingly obvious problem.

Until it all collapses.


3 posted on 06/10/2022 9:46:55 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I love it when conservatives float stupid ideas, usually around election time, on how to “save” social security by increasing the minimum age or reducing COLA, etc. As if any other program in DeeCee is solvent and needs to be saved by the working class? How about not giving Medicaid to illegals??


4 posted on 06/10/2022 9:47:47 AM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

(For now, we continue to “Whistle past the $96 Trillion graveyards.”)

Unfunded liabilities with Social Security and Medicare now over 169 trillion dollars


5 posted on 06/10/2022 9:47:55 AM PDT by SaveFerris (The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Nice to know that after paying in for over fifty years, and about to turn 66, that the government is using those dollars to subsidize people and programs some of whom it appears to have not put a penny in the system, and when this thing goes bust, my benefits, once applied for, may or will be reduced significantly. And of course with inflation roaring back, they can pay whatever residual is left in dollars that will dwindle in value to, well, maybe nothing. Hmmmmmm...I wonder what happens then......


6 posted on 06/10/2022 9:51:52 AM PDT by john drake (Lucius Accius-Roman,170 BC - "oderint dum metuant" translated "Let them hate so long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Social Security was always a Ponzi scheme.

The “Trust Fund” is just a bunch of paper in a filing cabinet in West Virginia:

https://moneymorning.com/2017/03/31/the-social-security-trust-fund-is-just-a-stack-of-ious-in-a-west-virginia-filing-cabinet/

It is supported by the “full faith and credit” of a gang of power-mad sociopaths in DC.

It is a “long con”...for now....


7 posted on 06/10/2022 9:52:28 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

To add, government black projects have siphoned upwards of 21-25 trillion...


8 posted on 06/10/2022 9:53:57 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

Both parties are just wishing and hoping the other party is in power when the plug gets pulled.

I’ll admit, I did not provide a replacement as I’ve been a childless lifelong bachelor. However, my Mormon sister makes up for it with four children, 16 grandchildren and, eventually, a boatload of great-grandchildren.

Further down the line, I think most of our country’s young will be Hispanics and Mormons. Not blacks because they kill each other too often and not non-Mormon whites because they’ve practically given up on large families.


9 posted on 06/10/2022 9:54:22 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (No food in the stores; fuel prices too high? Thank a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
All this is why I recommend those who reach 62, apply early for SS, which they paid into and is NOT a welfare program that many say. You get less than if waiting until 65, but in my case, I've made up that difference many times by receiving it early.

Folks, if you've been paying into that forced socialist program during your hard working years, THAT MONEY IS YOURS. Get it while it still exists! Sorry for our kids, but Congress long ago transferred the so-called "untouchable" SS funds into the General fund. Of course, that is spent on countless welfare programs for the gemmedats.

10 posted on 06/10/2022 9:57:05 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I wouldn’t worry. The world is gonna end before all this happens according to AOC.


11 posted on 06/10/2022 9:59:54 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“The question is whether elected leaders will make needed changes now...”

Lol. Some people believe that “leaders” will actually try to tackle this? They are too fixated on LGBTQ+ and abortion, etc.
Most of us here have known for a long time none of this is gonna end pleasantly.


12 posted on 06/10/2022 10:00:51 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
At the same time, welfare never runs out of money. Why is that?

13 posted on 06/10/2022 10:02:22 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Another Ponzi scheme. Gen x,y,z etc are the biggest bag holders in the history of the world. All this debt they get to inherit, with a world designed to destroy them via trade, immigration, and foreign affairs. etc.


14 posted on 06/10/2022 10:04:06 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I suggested raising the retirement age a few years last week and a poster here hated that idea. Well? What can be done then? It won’t be possible to raise taxes sky high. People won’t accept that politically and will vote out of office any politicians that try it. So the only other option is slashing benefits.


15 posted on 06/10/2022 10:05:29 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Well, if the government has the money to pay off student debt, certainly they have the money to balance Social Security. Problem is that SS recipients are already decided on how they will vote, but the younger-people/students, can still be bought off.


16 posted on 06/10/2022 10:09:30 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

And they never say that welfare and food stamp programs will run out of money.


17 posted on 06/10/2022 10:10:42 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

And, they probably voted for dems, too


18 posted on 06/10/2022 10:12:26 AM PDT by goodnesswins (....pervert Biden & O Cabal are destroying America, as planned. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Yup. FedGov took the money, spent the money, and replaced it with a “bond” they created and is NOT marketable. The only way to redeem that “bond” is to raise taxes or run a surplus (same thing). For too long they have been spending SS dollars twice.

Fear not. They WILL use the current financial problem they have created to stave off the inevitable. Watch for a move to confiscate private retirement accounts. 10% to start, shortly 25%, then the rest will be mandated to be “invested” in government securities for “safety” from stock market volatility.

19 posted on 06/10/2022 10:14:22 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
However, at that time, life expectancy was roughly 60-years of age. Therefore, expectations were that participants would not be drawing on social security for very long from an actuarial basis. Furthermore, roughly 16-workers paid into social security for each welfare participant.

I've never understood the life expectancy figures to be ONLY about when a person would die.

Figures used to be lower because so many children died in their first 5 years due to starvation, illness and accidents.

Once most people start living beyond five years old, life expectancy goes up.

Also, since children can be expensive in higher income countries, the trend is always women/couples having fewer children than more agrarian and poorer countries with high childhood death rates.

20 posted on 06/10/2022 10:14:33 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson