Agreed, Kemp was never under any serious risk of being primaried... Perdue, nor anyone else ever moved the needle in any polling...
Presenting that fraud is why Kemp won is ludicrous..
Raffensperger won by around 19 points... hard to claim “democrats” gave him the win even if the claim of 7% of his voters were dems..
These elections weren’t even close, and if you had something that showed something different leading up to the election fine, but no polling, public or private ever showed either of these races being close...
May not like it, but that’s the truth folks
I agree with you, but you're wasting your breath appealing to the truth of a matter with the idolatrous Trump cultists here. Their Prophet (or should it be "Messiah"?) can do no wrong. If it is perceived that he's incurred any sort of defeat, it's all down to somebody having "cheated."
It would be comic if it weren't so pathetic.
Unfortunately, a lot of MAGA voters will stay home in November, thanks to the GOPee voters in the primary, giving Stacy Abrams the win. JMO.
No, FRiend— that is the outcome of Raffensberger driven Dominion machines and ONLINE tech manipulation created, once again. Thus-— “truth” only to the completely naive.
These two f’ers are tools (and all of their crews in Atlanta go along with it) of the Chinese Communists. Through ComCast. NBC, MSNBC (Microsoft/GatesNBC)... and the entire spectrum of media and tech controlled by an organization
Trump correctly labeled and labels CON-Cast.
There will be a revolution in GA and Abrams already has a deal struck with Raffensberger to help her out— same modus operandi. But it can be stopped legislatively in State.
Marc Elias is otherwise embroiled with Durham and the fallout of his work in nearly all of the 6 fake Electoral voting in the 2020 Presidential. Elias kicked out of Perkins Coie. So Stacey is going to drum up the street crack gangs to riot and scare the decent citizens. Kemp is a Potemkin nothing- a shell facade. And up there with him is the very queer Pence (it goes all the way back to Indiana as governor there).
It appears your vision of the truth is limited to a belief that "at least 7% of early Republican voters were Democrats".
Even though they cited what must have been an obvious minimum number, are you certain the operatives at the "far-left Atlanta-Journal" would not think it helpful to understate even that number?
Do you think it also would be important to know the most likely number of cross-overs during the actual day of in person voting?
Presumably, Abrams needed as much as a single vote to win her unchallenged place on the ballot, if that. Are you certain there was not a number significantly higher than even "at least 7%" of cross-over voters on the day of election?
Finally, even if cross-over voting is permitted in GA, there is the question of whether the D's would be satisfied with leaving the election to a single mode of "corruption".
BTW, your There is no doubt Raffensperger turned a blind eye to flagrant fraud in his state as well... suggests you are not fully informed.
Raffensperger acted as an active participant in that flagrant fraud, with regard to both GA's acquisition of the Dominion machines (after one judge raised serious questions about the machines) and the fact he along with AG Carr essentially amended GA elections statutes when he signed the consent agreement for Abrams.