Posted on 05/24/2022 8:38:28 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
But after saying that, I still believe the lure of socialism is so strong for the average voter that only the crap it creates can affect elections. American thinking, in general, is now too addled and decayed to prevent calamities by using common sense whilst voting.
Good point.
And a foreigner, a Brit who left a socialist s&&thole to come here and lecture my president.
Screw him.
In this case they were discussing one Trump endorsed candidate who is going to lose by a large margin.
Wonder why these guys think they can speak for other people?
It is extraordinary how tone deaf the political class is, or in this case, the pundits. “Republicans” are not well defined, or should we maybe say Republicans in name only?
There is a perception in the majority of the electorate - notably among Democrats as well - that the elections are rigged. To suggest that it’s just “business as usual” is absurd.
I know they are just following orders, but it is disturbing to say the least.
I knew it at the time, but had forgotten it. But forgetting those kind of things is exactly what happens when you use a kitchen sink approach and overload people with warnings about "The Kraken" and every other conceivable issue under the sun. You have to figure out what your absolute best issues are, and hammer them, rather than throwing every possible argument out there in the hopes that people will be convinced by the sheer volume of allegations rather than their merit.
Even so, the issues with the nom-verification of signatures in Fulton county should be characterized as creating inherent unreliability rather than being proof of actual fraud. Too many times, the more zealous advocates don't seem to understand the difference between those two things. Actual fraud requires hard evidence, not inferences, and can be difficult to prove. But uncertainty / unreliability doesn't require hard evidence. It simply requires an examination of the rules then in effect to point out that they enable fraud to occur even if you can't prove each instance.
Election was stolen....with the help of some treacherous republicans!!!!!!!
They are obviously experts in their fields.
Who cares he’s not even a real American 🤪
AKA he’s a freakin foreigner aka part of the problem 👎🏻
We need Trump Now—Not in 2025. Will there even be an election in 2024? Will Biden get re-elected by 800 Million (Xeroxed) Mail in Votes? Will there even be a USA>?
I agree. Dominion voting machines weren't switching Trump votes to Biden, yet we spent how long on that canard? And once one of your theories are blown out of the water like that, it removes any shred of credence in any other theories.
I think it's actually a damn easy case to make. We can point out how European countries are uniformly much more stringent about absentee voting then we are. We can hammer why is it that we all used to know the night of the election who won, but sometimes we now don't know until a week or two later? We can point out that if you know you're not going to be there for an election, there is no reason you have to wait until the day of or a couple days before the election to mail your ballot. It's your responsibility to mail your ballot early, and if it doesn't arrive by election day, then it is not going to be counted.
I think they should have been a prime focus of Republican since the election, but it just hasn't happened. Very disappointing.
Except, Trump is not actually a loser. Crux of the issue.
So nuanced it almost seems unreal.
I, personally, believe you want to be outed as a traitorous Democrat who can't wait to blow the back of his head off with his own well-placed .45 shot to the back of his mouth. Is that correct? That's what happens when we speak for people with whom we have never conversed.
Wow! Remind me again about how many Votes Stuey got?-)
Instead of Trump whining, he should promote what that rank and file should do to participate in the election commissions in the states,
I haven’t heard of a lot of changes in those areas.
So, Trumpians can stand on the street corner and cry, or they can get involved and make changes.
The polls are the usual suppression tactics of the lamestream media.
To even take part in one of these polls, you must be classified as a 'likely voter,' which means you must have voted in the previous republican primary for governor, which was in 2018. That alone means that voters who were inspired by Trump and registered after 2018 were not eligible to be in the poll. Ditto for those who were complacent in 2018 and sat out primary (Trump endorsed Kemp and he had no real competition).
There is also the fact that GA has open primaries. So if you are a democrat and voted in the republican primary for governor in 2018, you would be eligible to take part in this poll. The title "Likely Republican Primary Voters" does not mean that they polled republicans who are likely to vote, but rather the poll consisted of voters who are likely to vote in the Republican Primary. That's a big difference in meaning.
Finally, reports on the ground in GA is that the MAGA turnout is the biggest it has ever been, surpassing anything that was seen in 2016 or 2020.
This is the primary that I want vengeance on for the Steal more than any others. If Raffensperger gets beaten by Jody Hice, I'm breaking out the champagne and dancing my happy dance.
And here it what makes no sense: Kemp and Raffensperger are two peas in a pod -- each a RINO traitor. It would seem logical to conclude that if Kemp is going to win his primary by a blowout margin, then so too must Raffensperger. Surely everyone who votes for Kemp will vote for Rat-boy. But the Lamestream media hasn't shown hardly any polling in Rat-boy's race.
It's going to be an interesting night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.