I knew it at the time, but had forgotten it. But forgetting those kind of things is exactly what happens when you use a kitchen sink approach and overload people with warnings about "The Kraken" and every other conceivable issue under the sun. You have to figure out what your absolute best issues are, and hammer them, rather than throwing every possible argument out there in the hopes that people will be convinced by the sheer volume of allegations rather than their merit.
Even so, the issues with the nom-verification of signatures in Fulton county should be characterized as creating inherent unreliability rather than being proof of actual fraud. Too many times, the more zealous advocates don't seem to understand the difference between those two things. Actual fraud requires hard evidence, not inferences, and can be difficult to prove. But uncertainty / unreliability doesn't require hard evidence. It simply requires an examination of the rules then in effect to point out that they enable fraud to occur even if you can't prove each instance.
I agree. Dominion voting machines weren't switching Trump votes to Biden, yet we spent how long on that canard? And once one of your theories are blown out of the water like that, it removes any shred of credence in any other theories.