In this episode, Dinesh answers Ben Shapiro and other critics and “fact checkers” of the documentary. Debbie and Dinesh talk about the baby food shortage, how Mike Esper thwarted Trump’s plans for Venezuela, and other current issues. Dinesh examines the discussion between Dante the pilgrim and his great-great grandfather Cacciaguida in the Circle of Mars.
https://rumble.com/v14mfd5-answering-ben-shapiro-dinesh-dsouza-podcast-ep330.html
Not interested in listening to nearly an hour of Dnesh. When does he discuss Shapiro?
Shapiro is good at debating dimwitted Democrat college students. He’s wrong about the 2000 Mules.
2000 Mules isn’t just about exposing the voter fraud. There are a couple other issues it exposes that are just as scary. Watch the movie more than once if you have to.
2000 Mules says nothing about how True theVote's geospatial data was translated into mule maps. Did the technicians who created those maps have backgrounds in such work? Where are the interviews with experts in geospatial data, evaluating the job done by True the Vote? How close did a mule have to come to a ballot box before TTV ranked the visit as a dropoff? Half a meter? 100 meters? The exact number matters. Why don't we know it? What was the quality of the SPECIFIC geospatial data used by TTV. Not the GENERAL quality of geospatial data, the quality of the SPECIFIC data used by TTV. Where we should have details, we have nothing.
Ben Shapiro's criticism of 2000 Mules could be summarized as "Interesting film that people should see, but it does not yet quite prove what it claims to prove. That might change with future data." As criticism goes, it could hardly have been milder.
What evidence INDEPENDENTLY confirms the mule maps as proof of America's biggest conspiracy? Ballot box videos don't confirm the maps, with just one possible exception. No testimony under oath confirms the maps, at least not yet. All we have is Dinesh D'Souza saying "Trust me!"