Posted on 04/16/2022 4:20:10 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Most of my audience is well aware that the World Economic Forum’s “Young Global Leader” initiative has yielded some of the most powerful people in the world. From leaders like Justin Trudeau and Gavin Newsom to tech giants like Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg, the disciples of Klaus Schwab and the New World Order make up a huge chunk of control over our world today.
What many may not know is that Elon Musk is among them. I don’t hold it against you if you didn’t know because there seems to have been a concerted effort to hide this fact. Searching on Google and other platforms for information about just about any of the previous graduates of Schwab’s school of globalism reveals tons of information, but a similar search for Musk’s participation is conspicuously slim. I had to go back to a 2008
Bloomberg article to find it.
In an article titled “Young Global Leaders–Anderson Cooper and Leonardo DiCaprio Are In The Most Exclusive Private Social Network In The World” by Bruce Nussbaum published March 17, 2008, it’s revealed that, “Elon Musk, the chairman of Tesla Motors, the much-publicized electric sports-car company, is a new YGL.”
As the billionaire pushes to buy Twitter outright, the vast majority of conservatives on the social network have been cheering him on. This makes sense considering he’s clearly trying to install a freer speech mentality there, denouncing censorship and claiming to be a “free speech absolutist.” But it must be noted that Musk is likely not the conservative hero many want him to be. In fact, he has a history of promoting anti-American ideas like Universal Basic Income, stronger economic ties with Communist China, and an outright embrace of a form of socialism that sounds an awful lot like the World Economic Forum’s push for “stakeholder capitalism.”
He seems to be making the right enemies in his bid for control of Twitter as both the U.S. government and hedge fund giant Vanguard have been making moves to block and/or intimidate him. That only endears him even more to conservatives, and while I think there’s a good chance he’s sincere, there’s also a good chance that he’s a shill for the globalist elites.
On the latest episode of The J.D. Rucker Political Report on America Out Loud Talk Radio, I dove into this topic in the first segment. In segment two, I questioned whether or not Democrats are suddenly all catching Covid-19 on Capitol Hill in order to keep the disease in mind before pushing for mail-in balloting ahead of the midterm elections. Segment three was all about water as we prepare for the crap hitting the fan.
I knew this long ago - and have noted that the online media has largely scrubbed the fact.
Elon Musk is a corporatist (not a libertarian): $4.9 Billion in taxpayer subsidies for three companies. He would not have gone into “green energy” if he could not have taken Other People’s Money. (We functionally no longer have taxation with representation.)
Elon Musk is a transhumanist: He owns Neuralink, which experiments with chipping pigs and monkeys, preparatory to chipping humans. (I guess Anthony Fauci is evil for endorsing torturous experimentation on beagles, but Elon Musk is super-duper-cool for endorsing doing so on pigs and monkeys.)
Elon Musk is a hedonist (again, not a libertarian, but a libertine): He indulges his every carnal appetite, reputedly including menage a trois. He does not in any way represent responsible sexual or personal morals in line with the Creator of our inalienable rights.
Elon Musk is a reprobate and a lunatic, one who wants to chip our brains, and then take our maimed slave breed to the stars. He is not opposition to the left; he is merely competition: just his own flavor of oligarch. He is an egomaniac who wants to run the world, and who only conserves his own egomaniacal pursuits.
I recall hearing some on the right correctly label him a “grifter” circa 2008. (Rush Limbaugh may have been one such.) I agreed, and moved on. I did not much care: Contrary to the self-serving sophistry employed by cookie-cutter conservatives (here and elsewhere), this ordained minister does not resent rich people for being rich; he resents rich people for pretending pretend to be what they are not (i.e., libertarian or conservative) - and more so resents pseudo-conservatives who worship a man who does not in any way exemplify conservative traits, nor is willing to pay the price to be truly conservative.
I care now because people who profess to be in some real way conservative are lionizing a man who is not in any way fundamentally conservative. The Founding Fathers would denounce Elon Musk categorically!
Whether Elon Musk remains in any way sympathetic to the goals of the WEF or not, he remains his own brand of transhumanist. Transhumanism is diabolical - and Elon Musk is a transhumanist. That alone makes him the enemy of all I hold dear: The Creator, and the Natural Law of His Creation.
It is what C. S. Lewis called “That Hideous Strength”: the devilish power of the Tower of Babel.
“Former” would seem a key word here.
Good information to keep in mind, but people do realize their mistakes and change direction.
“Former” would seem a key word here.
Good information to keep in mind, but people do realize their mistakes and change direction.
Google their name and WEF.
People are going to cut Musk slack for being involved with Klauss, but Tulsi Gabbard gets none. What Hypocrisy!!!!!!!!!
Musk is a libertarian; not a conservative.
The WEF/4th Industrial Revolution is all about technology. Why wouldn’t Musk be a part of that? Ya’ll think it’s some demonic plot. It is not. Schwab doesn’t care if you’re a country of communists, socialists, a republic or any other ism. Ya’ll keep mixing UN/NWO with the WEF. They are not the same. There are some that are on board the agenda for good and some that will abuse their power. That’s human nature. How far this agenda goes is up to us, but since we insist on sitting in our dark corners talking about demon and satanic cabals, we are not forcing conversation. How much, is too much? Basically at this point we are Fd.
A Staunch Liberal New Deal Democrat who still admired Roosevelt and his policies after he claimed to be a Republican.
At 20, I was a Goldwater Republican; at 40 I was a Reagan Conservative.
I like Musk, but he is not politically sophisticated.
I defer to Musk on all things related to engineering and business creation.
On USA politics and political principles - not so much.
What would you know about chick's, hummergiver?
Way to misunderstand my point.
You can think whatever you want about Elon (pronounced like “Ellen”).
https://rumble.com/v10rl1p-elon-buys-twitter-what-does-it-really-mean.html
William F Buckley was a Bonesman. It did not seem to capture his intellect.
rofl
I did not see his name when I looked at the WEF posted list but I also did not see Trudeau and I know he is an alumnus as are several others not listed. No surprise Musk is not listed or that he is a graduate.
Musk has been an insider on the take since he arrived on the scene. He would never have invested in Tesla if he did not have obama assurances. Space X is an obama era favor as far as I can see.
Musk is an insider. I have never trusted him and still don’t. He is a brilliant manipulator, huckster, charlatan and without principles or morals. In fact, he has the morals of an alley cat. Not always but usually one bad trait goes with many others.
Yes, she is on their list that has been published.
Whatever I may have thought well of her was dashed after learning that.
Thanks! Bump,
I expect that they have only just begun.
em is their hero and the hero of the yutes.
Why?
Any proof?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.