Skip to comments.
Stunner! Male cops can now strip-search females, on one condition
https://www.wnd.com ^
| April 13, 2022
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 04/13/2022 5:53:54 PM PDT by Enterprise
In the latest stunner from the transgender agenda sweeping across large parts of the free world, a ruling has been issued in the United Kingdom that male police officers now are being allowed to strip-search female suspects.
If the officer "identifies" as female.
The Daily Mail revealed the change came in new guidelines that have been issued to police forces across the nation, which also explain that a woman being stripped and searched could be accused of a hate crime if they object.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: police; pua; redpill; search; seriously; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Enterprise
This is from the Bee, right?
2
posted on
04/13/2022 6:00:18 PM PDT
by
sima_yi
( Reporting live from the far North)
To: Enterprise
Sounds good to me. Just have a bodycam going for a neutral witness.
3
posted on
04/13/2022 6:01:30 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Enterprise
What if the female examinee “identifies” the examiner as a male?
Why is his identifying to be respected but not hers?
4
posted on
04/13/2022 6:03:07 PM PDT
by
Buttons12
( )
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Enterprise
In the latest stunner from the transgender agenda sweeping across large parts of the free world, a ruling has been issued in the United Kingdom that male police officers now are being allowed to strip-search female suspects. If the officer "identifies" as female.
Thanks for the best BOL of the day!
6
posted on
04/13/2022 6:12:39 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Anyone, who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.!" ~ (Voltaire)!!!)
To: Buttons12
What if the suspect is a man identifying as a woman and the police officer is a woman identifying as a man? Then the “woman” suspect will object to the “male” officer examining “her.”
Or vice-versa.
The Western world has descended into utter insanity and lunacy all to accommodate 0.01% of the population.
7
posted on
04/13/2022 6:13:30 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“Liberty is an antecedent of government, not a benefit from government” ~ Clarence Thomas)
To: Enterprise
The one condition: they must buy them dinner first.
CC
8
posted on
04/13/2022 6:16:51 PM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
To: Enterprise
I thought it was going to be, “She has to be hot.”
9
posted on
04/13/2022 6:17:55 PM PDT
by
Rastus
To: ProtectOurFreedom
The Western world has descended into utter insanity and lunacy all to accommodate 0.01% of the population.All by design to pit one segment of society against the other. The communists do the same with race, age, college loans, illegal aliens, and more. Communism won't be accepted in a harmonious society. Hence chaos prevails......
10
posted on
04/13/2022 6:31:43 PM PDT
by
eeriegeno
(Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
To: Enterprise
That policy is for the birds!
To: Enterprise
Good news for women, rape is now legal if the rapist is transgender.
To: Enterprise
Should be males can deal with males, females with females, and other categories with pother categories.
13
posted on
04/13/2022 6:50:40 PM PDT
by
unlearner
(Si vis pacem, para bellum. Let him who desires peace prepare for war.)
To: Rastus
I thought it was going to be, “She has to be hot.”
What they said. /s
14
posted on
04/13/2022 6:54:47 PM PDT
by
drSteve78
(Second suis Deplorable STILL)
To: Enterprise
Benny Hill would be so banned today.
15
posted on
04/13/2022 6:56:04 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: Enterprise
Well that’s one way to get applications for police jobs up.
16
posted on
04/13/2022 7:06:02 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: eeriegeno
Excellent summary. Communism all started by pitting one class against another and expanded from there. Communists defended the “Scottsboro Boys” in the 20s fomenting racial war.
17
posted on
04/13/2022 7:07:01 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“Liberty is an antecedent of government, not a benefit from government” ~ Clarence Thomas)
To: Rastus
18
posted on
04/13/2022 7:07:06 PM PDT
by
fini
To: Rastus
LOL, that is a given, I would hope...
19
posted on
04/13/2022 7:18:16 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Democrats running things is termite infestation, and the exterminator won't be here for 3 years.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
20
posted on
04/13/2022 7:20:06 PM PDT
by
Bobalu
(I’m not nuts about Russia. But the lunatics who hate them tend to hate me too)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson