Durham Tells Court Not To Dismiss Charge Against Lawyer Who Hid Ties To Clinton Campaign

Zubu Brothers ^ | 3-7-2022 | Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times

[piasa]

Sussman leads to Marc Elias, Elias to Biden and Hillary. Obama appointee or not, this judge is likely to get a fish on her doorstep or some other mob warning just to make sure she dismisses the case.

[yesthatjallen]

"Durham gave an excellent response to a routine baseless motion by a crooked, ambulance chasing defense lawyer."

How long did it take Durham to name Sussmann? About 2 years? And after all that time, all that work to get ONE person, the judge may dismiss the case.

I hope I'm wrong. I wish Durham the best of luck but I'm a realist. This is dragging out to the point it's not going to matter.

[Navy Patriot]

Can't blame you for being a realist, you have a LOT of evidence supporting your position, and it is wise to consider that possibility. Also "Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied", is more true than false.

I, too, hope that Durham Perseveres and Prevails.

[Robert DeLong]

I believe she, Judge Beryl Howel, will dismiss. Not for any other reason then she is a committed team player for the Democrats, and especially for Obama.

[Robert DeLong]

Poor choice of words by the author, or you are misinterpreting how the word tell is being used. Either way, they probably should have used the word responds, and then there would be no confusion. 🙂

Durham had to respond, so he said that the case should not be dismissed, and gave his reasons as to why it should not be dismissed. I contend she will dismiss the charges anyway, because she is an Obama lackey.

Now, had Trump been charged with the same thing, she would have thrown the book at him.

[kjam22]

You tell the judge in his chambers that he can be investigated too…..

[kjam22]

Judges can be investigated too…..

[1Old Pro]

Democrat Judges are as corrupt as the corrupt Dems. You never want a corrupt Dem judge to make a call that effects you.

[oil_dude]

“Why would they dismiss the charge? They’d lock us up for lying to the feds.”

Are you serious?? Haven’t been paying attention? Liberals don’t go to jail. Only conservatives.

[oil_dude]

No, he is warning the Judge that the charges are extremely serious, he may have swayed an election, and there is more to it. More to come.

[Yo-Yo]

Poor choice of words by the author, or you are misinterpreting how the word tell is being used. Either way, they probably should have used the word responds, and then there would be no confusion. 🙂

Yes, Durham was responding to Sussman's motion to dismiss the charge because his lie to the FIB was not 'material' to the FIB's decision to open a case based on the Steele Dossier.

Durham argued that the point of the lie being material or immaterial should be decided by a jury at trial, not by a pretrial motion, and cited precedents.

[Yo-Yo]

You tell the judge in his chambers that he can be investigated too…..

The Hoover FIB would have shown the judge photographs of him leaving a seedy motel with a woman not his wife...

[Robert DeLong]

It wasn't about the Steele dossier at all, because what was said in that dossier is that it described the relationship between Putin and a guy named Oleg Govorun, who the dossier claimed worked for Alfa in the 1990s (that date was wrong but not the affiliation).

This was a claim that Trump was supposedly communicating to a Russian bank, Alfa-Bank. He claimed he was reporting like a good responsible citizen, and that he had no client involved in what he was communicating.

You are also wrong that it was not material at all.

Furthermore, his rebuttal argument for not dismissing the case, had nothing to do with letting a jury decide. It was about the fact that if he had been honest about who he was working for, the Clinton campaign, then it would have likely not resulted in an FBI investigation.

The Odd Projection by the Steele Dossier’s Claimed Alfa Bank Source