Mark Steyn Discusses the Ukraine Conflict and Bigger Stuff, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

The Last Refuge ^ | March 4, 2022 | sundance

[Bratch]

Mark Steyn Discusses the Ukraine Conflict and Bigger Stuff, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

March 4, 2022 | Sundance | 39 Comments

The first white horse, pestilence (virus); the second red horse, war (Ukraine); the third black horse, famine (fertilizer shortage); and the final horse, death.

Stunningly, in this monologue Mark Steyn takes a tour reminding viewers of the past two years of western government action, while connecting the corporate mandates from the World Economic Forum.  That outline is brave considering the mention of the totalitarian shift amid New Zealand, Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States when attached to the WEF is normally a third rail of discussion.

However, Steyn doesn’t stop at pointing out the hypocrisy of the collective west in their current drumbeat against Vladimir Putin; instead, he takes the last few years, puts in a deep breath, and then connects it… to the world’s most popular history book.  

WATCH:

Mark Steyn gives his view that we are experiencing a 'Western apocalypse'

What I will say about this, I said last night… and I repeat it here for emphasis:

“If Joe Biden, NATO, the EU, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Word Economic Forum and the multinational corporations in this alliance of Public/Private geopolitical partnerships, succeed in the fight against Vladimir Putin – I promise you, we are not going to like the world on the other side of their victory.”

With every fiber of my being, I mean that sincerely.

The global elite, the people and systems previously called the ‘New World Order‘, have taken a zero-sum position in this situation with Russia and Ukraine.  The construct of their approach is purposeful, intentional and provides no alternate options.  One side will win everything, the other side will be left with NOTHING.

On the globalist side there is no one asking the question: at what cost, do we want to win?

What we are seeing is a full-blown alignment of interests between globalist government and their partnered multinational corporations and financial institutions.

This is not a good thing to witness regardless of the outcome in Ukraine.

Think about the direct message and the implications here. Think about the world of multinational corporate compliance and how they will kneel to the dictates of political power in the aftermath of this current enterprise.

If this collective group of multinationals and government interests succeed in this approach, everything will change.

If you think corporations, Big Tech and Big Banks, et al, are controlling and politically motivated now?  Good grief, just wait.

The global future being outlined in this NATO/EU/WEF strategy to use private industry as a weapon, is like the government attack on Canadian truckers/supporters taken to an exponential scale.

Now, overlay your pending requirement to walk around with a digital identity and you can see exactly how easy it will be to de-person, which is one layer higher than de-bank.

I mean seriously, think about this approach toward Vladimir Putin.  What I just described above is our future if the globalists defeat Putin.  Another question to ask yourself is – what happens if Putin wins?

How does the international assembly of government approach Russia in the aftermath?  A G20 summit?  Ha!

What do you think Putin and his allies like China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and possibly India, South Africa, Brazil will do now?

What globalist Rubicons are being crossed right now that can never be reversed?

The dollar lost as a global trade currency.  The end of the petro-dollar?

These are very real possibilities, perhaps even probabilities now.

[Bratch]

[mware]

Been thinking along those same lines myself lately.

[Tell It Right]

Some people aren't afraid of the football version of the "four horsemen" LOL

[Steve_Seattle]

Haven’t seen Steyn on Fox for months.

[BrexitBen]

Don’t miss this 6 minute video.

Steyn is a national treasure.

[Gene Eric]

Putin referenced NGOs numerous times in his address about a week ago.

The MSM is casting Putin’s actions as capricious ambitions. I suspect otherwise.

[ClearCase_guy]

I think it needs to be said.

A huge percentage of people here really hate Putin and get upset at any comment which seems to support him. I don’t think either Putin or Ukraine are good, and I think neutrality is the best policy for the US.

But, having said that, I will say that Putin is fighting against the Great Reset and the New World Order of the Globalists. Putin is clearly a nationalist and he clearly wants Russia to be a Great power.

Of course I see great differences between Trump and Putin. But Trump is also a nationalist and also wants America to be a Great Power (MAGA).

Neither Trump nor Putin want a One World Government run by the World Bank/UN/EU/etc.

Ukraine is very much on the side of the Globalists and the Globalists very much want to stop Putin. The world will be a better place if the Globalists suffer a setback. I do not think Putin is the correct thing to fear.

[Guenevere]

I heard he is broadcasting from England......I don’t remember the details

[PMAS]

**

[al baby]

I stopped listening to talk radio the day Rush died

[mel]

Most people I read think Putin loose this one

[BuchananBrigadeTrumpFan]

I agree... and the people who think Putin should be assassinated may greatly regret it if/when they meet his replacement.

[mewzilla]

And that video above is a perfect example of why you won’t.

Trump ought to play it at a rally.

[Guenevere]

Clarity is a commodity we have precious little of during this present darkness.

Thanks for yours!

[Fiji Hill]

The Four Horsemen: Stuhldreher, Miller, Layden & Crowley, with Stanford coach Pop Warner and Notre Dame coach Knute Rockne at the 1925 Rose Bowl.

[Tell It Right]

In the very next Rose Bowl (1926), here's Johnny Mack Brown helping Bama to win the first of three Rose Bowl victories in a 10-year span, prompting the press to quit counting the Rose Bowl as the decider of champions. Basically, it wasn't Notre Dame fatigue, but Alabama fatigue that is the basis for the AP Poll (much like in our lifetime Alabama fatigue took us from the BCS to the playoff system).

Bama's first Rose Bowl was pretty much the game that changed the south. Our southern interest with football became a fascination on Jan 1, 1926. LOL

As far west as Texas and as far north as Arkansas, people across the southeast woke up on Jan 2, 1926 to newspaper headlines saying things like "Alabama Wins Rose Bowl for Entire South". LOL It's even part of the fight song lyrics "...remember the Rose Bowl we're winning".

Until the Rose Bowl made an agreement to play only Big Nine and PCC teams (today's Big 10 and Pac-12) beginning in the 1947 Rose Bowl (right after Alabama got yet another Rose Bowl win in 1946), Alabama pretty much owned the Rose Bowl with a 4-1-1 record.

[roving]

Since Russia plays such a big role in the end, that tells me there won’t be a nuclear war. We are already doing what the bible said we and all the other countries will do when Israel is invaded. Nothing.

[roving]

The bible tells us people will scoff and make fun all the way to the end. Like you.

[kelly4c]

Same here. And I’ve received some real signs from the Spirit.

[thesearethetimes...]

Marking for later…