Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ve never had much enthusiasm for the idea of investing based on death-rate trends. In the long run, deaths equal births (plus foreign-born immigrants). If people are dying younger, well, sure, there’s going to a short-term spike in the death-related businesses. But later on there’ll be a comparable death dearth at some point.


4 posted on 02/21/2022 1:15:15 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: irishjuggler

Enough death and you won’t be around to cash in, so to speak. But cyclical investments don’t have to be forever and in this case the point is not to get a hot stock tip, but to process the data-based confirmation of the impact of the death jabs.


5 posted on 02/21/2022 1:17:11 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

I was holding some of these a few years back just based on the baby boomer population starting to get up in age… but I didn’t have the patience to keep them LOL


9 posted on 02/21/2022 1:37:22 PM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson