One learns the following about this interesting entity (health feedback), which is a subset of a larger web presence (science feedback) which wraps into (climate feedback):
healthfeedback.org Gandi SAS - registered On:2018-09-02
Organization: Climate Feedback
State:11 (Province of Île-de-France and parts of the former province of Champagne) France
Operated by: https://climatefeedback.org/
"Climate Feedback is a worldwide network of scientists sorting fact from fiction in climate change media coverage. Our goal is to help readers know which news to trust."
"Science Feedback is a non-profit organization registered in France whose mission is defined in its status as to improve the credibility of science-related information online, in the media and on social media."
As there are physicians and other "expert" voices on both sides of many issues, this Paris-based website which conducts it business in English represents a "view" debunking other "views."
This particular "proof" says "Inadequate support: No data is provided to support the claim that there has been a 20 times increase of cancer in vaccinated patients. There is also no evidence supporting the claim that COVID-19 vaccines weaken the immune system."
If one uses any search engine, one finds multiple views on both sides of the issue, such that the issue is not as yet settled.
Given that, "no evidence" hardly debunks anything.
Given that the mRNA experimental drugs remain in phase three clinical trials as of today, and given that the data from these experimental trials has\ve not as yet been released, and given that the mRNA pharmaceuticals are fighting against release of data prematurely, one may easily argue that there is no agreement in the scientific community as a whole as to mRNA experimentals weakening the immune system. To present a view that "there is no scientific evidence" is to be less than forthcoming" in the same way that any hypotheses about this topic are complete and replete with data.
The editor of the debunking article is identified as Flora Teoh.
One reads from a Gateway Pundit article in their usual style: "SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT! Singapore Woman Linked to Bill Gates, Soros and China Is Flagging and Removing ALL VIDEO CONTENT by California Doctors Behind Viral Video."
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/shocking-development-singapore-woman-linked-bill-gates-soros-china-flagging-removing-video-content-california-doctors-behind-viral-video/
The California physicians are Erickson and Massihi. Of their views from 2020: "Nearly a month after our reporting, a ‘factchecker’ by the name of Flora Teoh, who is not a medical doctor, claimed that the Bakersfield doctors were promoting false information. Flora Teoh concluded the US doctors were not telling the truth."
One reads a little further: "Teoh is affiliated with multiple international organizations that are sponsored by Facebook, Google, MacArthur Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, and Omidyar Network."
He said. She said. Sounds like at the root of the "health feedback" is politics, power and money. It is interesting that DugwayDuke responded with his "debunking": so quickly, given that a bit of time fleshes out the game.
It is all the more interesting as his tagline reads: (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
Seems so, even for DugwayDuke.
Wow Worldtraveler, you found a lot of information on sciencefeedback.co background.
I found on their website:
https://sciencefeedback.co/partners-funders-donors/
Facebook, Google, Citris among others. Plus they have the seal from INTERNATIONAL Factchecker’s network
Science Feedback has received accreditation from the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at The Poynter Institute. Previously accredited based on its Climate Feedback platform, Science Feedback now includes Health Feedback, which focuses on vetting trending health-related claims.
Won’t even get started on Poynter except to say that if they could they would probably want to shut down the this site since they are affiliated with many global media censors and causes. https://www.poynter.org/coronavirusfactsalliance/
DugwayDuke, Nice globalist-aligned source ya got there. It’s called research, and I am surprised that a poster with a 1999 start date would post globalist sites, but then the vaccines are about globalism and with your start date you should get it....Either you did not know you posted a globalist, elitist leaning/funded link, or you knew and support them...
Wow, thanks for the research! It is interesting to run this stuff to ground.
So the climate change folks want people to get the shot.
I think I’ll go ahead and pass.