Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Expected, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Will Step Down, Biden Will Likely Nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson
Conservative Treehouse ^ | Jan 26, 2022 | Sundance

Posted on 01/26/2022 2:52:56 PM PST by gattaca

Multiple media reports now affirming that Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer will retire at the end of the current court term [ABC Report – NBC Report] setting up the final step to elevate DC Appeals Court Judge Kentanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.

This is exactly what was planned from the appointment of Merrick Garland to U.S. Attorney General. [GO DEEP] As CTH outlined in January 2021, the series of moves was/is predictable. The Obama crew behind Biden have been following a predictable roadmap. Four sequential steps.

In March 2021, Merrick Garland was confirmed Attorney General to open his seat in the DC Appeals Court for Kentanji Brown Jackson. KBJ’s appointment to that specific court needed Senate confirmation. In June 2021, KBJ was confirmed [GO DEEP] with a vote of 53-47. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Lindsey Graham voted with Democrats to support KBJ to the circuit court. Now Breyer steps down and KBJ is nominated to replace him.

“U.S. Appeals Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, a former Breyer clerk, public defender and Biden appointee who won three Senate Republican votes in confirmation, is considered a top contender for nomination” ~ABC

As we predicted in March 2021, “this is how they roll”. With Obama’s crew you always have to watch the other hand – the third and fourth moves.

MARCH 2021 – Judge Garland was an important judge on the important DC Circuit Court. Garland’s replacement will be a senate confirmed seat for that court.

Once that replacement is Senate confirmed, we anticipate (almost to a certainty) that replacement will be quickly elevated to a Supreme Court nomination to replace Justice Stephen Breyer, now 82-years-old. The Senate will have no political ammunition to block or not confirm the radical SCOTUS pick, because she will have been confirmed a few months before. It’s a smart play.

Garland himself is too old (69) and too centrist for the interests of the JoeBama ideology; but watch for JoeBama-Biden to move activist DC District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson (50), twenty years Garland’s junior, into the DC Circuit Appeals Court role.

Despite her known activist ideology, Judge Kentanji Brown Jackson will likely achieve Senate confirmation without issue for the circuit court role. Soon thereafter, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Bryer announces his departure, and Judge Brown Jackson is quickly nominated as Bryer’s replacement.

Having passed senate confirmation recently, activist Judge Kentaji Brown Jackson -a black female who checks all the boxes- is then positioned to avoid Senate challenge and will move swiftly through the SCOTUS confirmation process.

It is a typically Obama-esque play. As a standalone nomination for SCOTUS she would be a radical pick; Justice Brown Jackson is a known activist in the DC District Court; however, with this maneuver she could get through nomination easier and then sit on the highest court for thirty years.

Additionally, Obama’s former White House Homeland Security Advisor, Lisa Monaco, will be Deputy Attorney General supporting Garland. Monaco then becomes the insurance policy to keep an eye out for the ideological needs of the JoeBama administration and assist with the smart political targeting that will come from the DOJ, FBI and the IRS. (link)

We all know that Biden is an avatar for Obama’s third term. Hence the plan by Team Obama (BLM) and James Clyburn (AME) to use a cognitively impaired tool to secure the 2020 club nomination. They then inserted Kamala Harris as the useful radical to manipulate for actual policy objectives.

Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never return to that time before when you did not see them. It’s all a conspiracy theory until it’s proven accurate, then it’s racist…


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bidenscotuspick; kentanjibrownjackson; sundance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2022 2:52:56 PM PST by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gattaca
How about -


2 posted on 01/26/2022 2:57:19 PM PST by 4Liberty (Let's go Brandon 👏 ...👏 ...👏👏👏 https://youtu.be/qr_F_XQrukM?t=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Very possible. They said it would have to be a black woman, and she seems to qualify. At least she doesn’t appear to be trans, so I guess that’s something to be grateful for.

Many people thought he’d pick Kamala just to get rid of her, but her black credentials are pretty shaky and I don’t think anybody wants to go there. Kamala appeared on a list of the top successful Indian-Americans, and since she was brought up in Toronto in the Indian community there, I’d say that’s where she belongs. Black people, including her own slightly black Jamaican father, have not embraced her.

So that still means they have to figure out a way to palm off Kamala...LOL!


3 posted on 01/26/2022 2:58:46 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Well, I am holding out for Stacey Abrams. We need a dumb-arse black woman to counterbalance the Wise-Latina.


4 posted on 01/26/2022 3:08:37 PM PST by Tupelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

Aren’t there any disabled transgender “female origin” blacks around?


5 posted on 01/26/2022 3:12:40 PM PST by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

Not black, sorry.

What gets me is when you appoint a double/triple/quadruple minority from among all the possible candidates, it’s supposed to prove that said that people from said d/t/q group are just as capable and qualified as anyone. Great, bravo.

But if you select that person BECAUSE they are from that group—to the exclusion of all others—you haven’t proven anything.


6 posted on 01/26/2022 3:14:33 PM PST by Apparatchik (If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

If she is an enemy of white people she is an easy approval by the US Senate.


7 posted on 01/26/2022 3:17:16 PM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

No loss on the balance of the court. It is a liberal replacing a liberal.


8 posted on 01/26/2022 3:18:32 PM PST by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

Re: Aren’t there any disabled transgender “female origin” blacks around?

Going on appearances, Stacy Abrams sorta kinda maybe fills that bill.


9 posted on 01/26/2022 3:21:23 PM PST by Tupelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

“Garland himself is too old (69) and too centrist...”
Only compared to Adolf Eichmann


10 posted on 01/26/2022 3:21:45 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The leftist bloc on SCOTUS is a mindless bloc with no depth or independence. This changes nothing.


11 posted on 01/26/2022 3:27:09 PM PST by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

You do know its Obama in he White House right?


12 posted on 01/26/2022 3:32:21 PM PST by The MAGA-Deplorian ( 2022 - VOTE THE BUMS OUT —— ALL OF THEM! RE-ELECT NO ONE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

Too much common sense.


13 posted on 01/26/2022 3:34:45 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
Well, I am holding out for Stacey Abrams.

Abrams is a corpulent hambeast. Only 48, she's already got a foot in the grave due to her gluttony. Ten years from now, she'll have a lot of health problems.

14 posted on 01/26/2022 3:36:47 PM PST by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
If she is an enemy of white people she is an easy approval by the US Senate.

She was already approved last April 53-44 for Merrick Garland's vacated seat on the United States Court of Appeals.

15 posted on 01/26/2022 3:40:02 PM PST by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

It will not be Ketanji Brown Jackson this time because there is a college admissions affirmative action case scheduled to be heard in the Fall SCOTUS session. Harvard is on of the defendants and KBJ is on the Harvard Board of Trustees. She would have to recuse herself leaving the court split 6-2. To save discriminatory admissions practices 2 conservatives would have to vote in favor of discriminating against Asians and white applicants. That would save the status quo but not count as a precedent. It is inevitable the courts will eventually have to sunset affirmative action but having it happen shortly after a Roe v Wade reversal would be a Democrat defeat on par with the Axis losing the Battle of Stalingrad and El Alamein on the same day.


16 posted on 01/26/2022 4:13:20 PM PST by your other brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Kentaji???? REALLY???? KENTAJI??


17 posted on 01/26/2022 4:18:44 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

I’m confused. Are we allowed to have men on the bench anymore?

It doesn’t really seem it.


18 posted on 01/26/2022 4:28:14 PM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: your other brother

She will not recuse herself just like Kagan did not recuse herself over Obamacare. She’s a leftist ideologue like Kagan.

These people do not do tradition, civility, or legality for that matter.


19 posted on 01/26/2022 4:41:07 PM PST by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

“Abrams is a corpulent hambeast. Only 48, she’s already got a foot in the grave due to her gluttony. Ten years from now, she’ll have a lot of health problems.”

And that’s a bad thing?


20 posted on 01/26/2022 4:42:56 PM PST by Andy'smom (Proud member of the basket of deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson