Posted on 01/23/2022 3:10:46 AM PST by Kaslin
If you’ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes....
For regular American Thinker readers, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Roughly two weeks ago, Jay Valentine wrote about the extent of fraud he and his team have discovered as they’ve uploaded voter rolls (which often had corrupted data that seemed deliberately intended to keep information opaque) into Valentine’s system. Once the information for any given state was loaded and sorted, it invariably revealed rather surprising information in both red and blue states. Among other things, in one red state, there were “4,300 people over 100 years old on their rolls. Some were 121. Those were the kids. The really old ones were almost 2,000 years old, and there were a bunch of them – and they voted.”
(For those wondering, my understanding is that Valentine did not identify specific states because it’s important for the volunteer canvassers to have complete anonymity. Naming states could make the officials who are being exposed as corrupt or inept start looking for canvassers.)
The revelations out of Wisconsin (and I have no idea whether Jay Valentine has been part of the Wisconsin analysis) are staggering. It turns out that at least one out of every 14 voters in Wisconsin is at least 124 years old. Thus, to register in 1918, a person would have had to have been 21 or older.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
IMHO, if you want the best chance of discovering voter fraud look at those votes that were counted during those rapid late night ‘catch up and pass’ surges that look so anomalous on a graph.
No.
But Deep State, pretending to be them, did.
Which is why those RCV provisions are in every bill Deep State keeps trying to ram down our throats.
Even if every voter is a legal voter, with those RCV provisions in place, Deep State can still steal elections.
It still tells me there is a voter registration roll there that is not actually accurate and confirmed.
What I take from reports like this is that the most secure election in history had major problems. You don’t need to believe that 100,000 people registered in 1918 voted in the election but you can recognize that the glitch anomaly or fraud was actually there. You don’t have to believe that the gang in Atlanta rescanned multiple ballots taken from suitcases under desks but you can acknowledge there is video of this happening. Laws were broken rules were violated evidence that was supposed to be maintained for a certain period was erased and destroyed. The media tries to portray all this as minor and just procedural problems that had no effect on the outcome of the election. And they are conditioning people to believe that anyone who dares question the legitimacy of Biden is a lunatic.
Other stories say about 20% of the suspect registrations are recorded as voting in 2020, IIRC.
Well, last week the oldest person in America died.
She was 115 years old
Why don’t they simply replace these default dates with something like N/A meaning not available?
Generally speaking, no data is less of a problem than fake data. Don’t these idiots realize that?
Of course they did. They were registered weren’t they?
They will have to nail this down. Leftists and their propaganda arm the Corporate Media would love nothing more than to claim our side is pushing this without foundation and then claim that this is “proof” any and all claims about the massive election fraud we all know happened are “just a conspiracy theory”.
So check, check and re-check this before we publicly make this claim.
You ain’t wrong.
...any accusations of such is grounds for persecution, prosecution, fines and jail time.
This is what it's coming to.
For What It’s Worth Department......
In those situations where a municipality’s legacy system did not track a voter’s date of birth or initial date of registration, a default date for either of those was entered into the SVRS for that voter as these were required fields moving forward from 2006. The default date of birth is 1/1/1900 and the default date of registration is 1/1/1918. See FAQ on other data conversion questions regarding phone numbers found here: https://elections.wi.gov/node/7514
Since 2006, many of these default values have gone away, as voters move or update their name which requires them to re-register to vote. The voter’s “old” record containing the default information (1/1/1900 DOB or 1/1/1918 date of registration) is merged with the “new” record that the voter creates. This merge of records maintains the voter’s history of participation in elections, the voter’s former address or former name. Some voters have also proactively updated their date of birth with their local clerk even if they were not required to do so as part of a new voter registration. And some municipal clerks have also proactively contacted voters who have default information and asked them to update the information.
Even so, as of fall 2021 there are still about 3,700 active voter records that contain default information for date of birth. In addition, about 120,000 records exist in the system with a default date of voter registration. Voters in either of those groups are not affected in any way by the default dates shown in their registration record.
https://elections.wi.gov/node/7516
“Why don’t they simply replace these default dates with something like N/A meaning not available?”
Strictly a guess based on my basic understanding of databases: the date field has to be filled out to a certain criteria or the entire record is “INVALID”. Thus, the nonsense date merely keeps the record active until corrected data are entered. I’m sure you recognize this can either open the door to fraud or it merely keeps a voter on the rolls without hassling them to provide the correct info. In more innocent times, I’d lean toward the second answer while current circumstances are rapidly removing my belief in basic honesty.
I disagree with your characterization of this issue.
And nothing personal, but I am not inclined to accept at face value the harmless explanation provided by the Wisconsin Elections Commission at the link you provided, put out there by the very people tasked with providing a secure election who have not only failed, but are probably complicit in fraud either wholly or partially.
I read the explanation at your link. It means absolutely nothing except a mechanical explanation. I have worked with databases both in the building and design of them and the workflows to enter data into them, and have encountered the 1/1/1900 date issue often enough.
The point is, that, at best, the voting rolls are inaccurate for whatever reason, and that is enough. If someone is going to illegally loot a house or store using a disaster as cover, it makes no difference if that disaster is due to flooding, fire, tornado, or war.
Likewise, it is 100% clear that for election fraud perpetrated using mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting (or any other scheme) to have a chance of succeeding, those fake ballots must be taken from real rolls of voters, not made up names, and especially the names of people who aren’t likely to vote.
Precaution one to anyone perpetrating election fraud is taking names on the voting rolls, so any checks back will show a registered voter. This also prevents the embarrassing error of having more votes in a precinct than regular voters.
Precaution two is to get names of people who either haven’t voted are aren’t going to vote, such as disabled people and many in nursing homes and such. This avoids the situation where someone is shown to have voted twice, or a vote was denied as already counted.
And I could go on. There are a lot of additional reasons to have valid voter rolls to prevent fraud. And don’t think for a second that the people perpetrating this kind of fraud don’t know where the weaknesses are, and why they should be exploited in specific ways to reduce the likelihood for detection.
There are two major issues here: One, is that the voter rolls are flawed and thus not useful as a tool for secure elections. That should be enough right there. The second is the maintenance of them. Under no circumstance should a voter be in that database without a valid date of birth and valid address. You do a mass printing of everyone with a 1/1/1901 (or 1918) date, mail them a postcard at the designated address telling them they need to re-register to vote, remove them from the rolls, and go forward from there.
You may think this makes us look like idiots to be concerned about it. In light of what happened in 2020, and likely for decades before that, for us to ignore any vector into a corrupt election (especially one so obvious as voter rolls with HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of invalid dates of birth) I think we would be idiots NOT to be concerned about it.
In the last presidential election I brought my brother’s original death certificate and asked if they would delete his name from roll. Since he lived with me and we have the same last name, it should be easy to delete.
I was told to take it to the Election Board in NYC. Why make it so hard to delete a deceased person????
Apparently they did.
And any American citizen who disagreed with it and went to DC - UN-ARMED, to let their disagreement be known, is sitting in a jail cell.
We have lost our Republic.
I was told to take it to the Election Board in NYC. Why make it so hard to delete a deceased person????
Question
Can you walk up to the election worker and change any info on your
personal record? Or do you have to do it with Election Board. In other
words I don’t think the voter poll workers have that authority.
A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes....
But what is does do, like in a trial, if there is one thing that presents question of truth, it throws out all the testimony.
The process of votings needs to be corrected.
One out of every 14 voters in Wisconsin is at least 124 years old.
It’s what the democrats call an honest election
I agree with you, there is organized RAT voter fraud, without a doubt.
To me, as a self-exiled member of a dimocRAT family, I view stories like these differently. I witnessed instinctive dimocRAT voter fraud theology from birth.
To me, these stories are like someone grabbing a loose thread on a gigantic dimocRAT voter fraud quilt and starts pulling. The more we can tatter that quilt, the better.
Many dim families have grandma and grandpa voter registrations updated and handy even though they died in 1968 from heart attacks when Nixon won. Attitudes like this at the voter level encourages bigger more elaborate weaves in the voter fraud quilt.
I think of it like Rudy Giuliani’s “Broken Windows Theory” of policing that should be utilized trying to eliminate dimocRAT voter fraud, IMHO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.