Posted on 01/12/2022 5:56:11 AM PST by Red Badger
It all started with a simple admission. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla joined Yahoo Finance’s Anjalee Khemlani to discuss vaccines, boosters, and Omicron. He admitted what we already know based on the results we’ve been seeing, but in doing so he opened up a can of worms.
Here’s what he said, emphasis added:
“So — and we know that the two doses of the vaccine offer very limited protection, if any. The three doses, with the booster, they offer reasonable protection against hospitalization and deaths — and, again, that’s, I think, very good — and less protection against the infection.”
This slip was intended to try to get more people to take the booster shots, but as it spread across social media it had the opposite effect. Those who have been following the regimen offered by Big Pharma and promoted by out government started asking questions about the actual efficacy of the drugs they’ve been injecting into their bodies. Meanwhile, those who are among the dreaded “anti-vaxxer” crowd were highlighting the idiocy of the admission.
Sports and political commentator Clay Travis was among many people to share the video clip. He claims he was hit with a copyright claim by Pfizer or someone associated with them to have the video taken down.
Pfizer made a copyright claim to remove their CEO’s video comments that two doses of their covid vaccine offers “limited protection, if any.” This is wild. https://t.co/jP25VShswZ
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) January 11, 2022
When admitting the truth is so damaging that you need to stifle it before more people hear it, what does that say about your agenda? Those who are still defending Pfizer’s and Big Pharma’s profits by parroting their lies need to wake up immediately.
Time to find and download the clip!
Let’s go, Bourla!
Yahoo Finance = Apollo Global Management = International Bankers.
This is absurd, but it’s fair use. Further, Pfizer doesn’t own the copyright. Yahoo does to the extent it’s not in the public domain.
Who shot the video? I don’t believe that I was an internal Pfizer video. Perhaps the CEO is making a right of publicity claim in his image. But I have to believe that if he voluntarily appeared on the interview, he gave license to use his image or failed to restrict its use.
Weird claim.
Shows what we all know, they are scum.
⬆
Yeah, right. So you can be investigated by the deep state tyrants.
At some point in the future, you may hear from that side, “The injections really do nothing good, but you are should get more boosters anyway. After all, one more injection might save a life”.
Note that there is no denial of what was said, only that we were not meant to see or hear what was said.
As long as drug advertising accounts for half of the income of the media, the media will do as told by the those companies.
Notice that Travis doesn't know who made the copyright claim.
He's just claiming Pfizer to sensationalize the issue.
I saw a commercial yesterday,
a “ Pfizer loves you” type commercial advertising Pfizer .
Not a drug/ pill commercial, just a warm fuzzy love us please commercial.
Lots of smiling kids and pets and families and barbeques and hero nurses doctors.
Cuz.,,, Pfizer loves us.
Far too late for that because... Internet!
.
If it gets online it’s forever. Stupid move for Pfizer to even try.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.