Agencies under the full control of the executive branch have been setting regulation never enumerated with actual words in the laws passed. The dreaded “...and for other purposes...” bolted on to laws passed needs to be found illegal,,, again.
Roberts and hid fellow employees of Fedzilla are there to protect Fedzilla.
We need the new Republican Congress to adopt a “must impeach” stance against ALL lower court judges whose decisions are overturned on Constitutional grounds. There MUST be a price to pay for judges who overstep their authority.
I’d like to listen to Mark Levin elaborate on this. Anyone know if he’s discussed?
Hopefully, the Supreme Court doesn't share Bette Midler's view of West Virginia.
Arguably, the SC is shutting the gate after the horses have already scattered into the country side.
I say this because millions of knowledgeable people with a functioning brain have lost ALL respect for the Supreme Court.
WHY? Because in late 2020 and early 2021, hiding behind the overly used legal doctrine of “standing”, this John Roberts court and approximately 50 of it’s sub ordinate federal district courts ALL, IN UNISON, refused to even listen to overwhelming EVIDENCE of ILLEGAL activities by the Democrats in the 2020 election.
A convicted kidnapper (Demarcus Sears) has standing in a case about hitting his head as a child but the very EXISTENCE of the country did not have standing.
Texas and many other states combined do not have standing to Roberts but a fn convicted kidnapper’s head injury, decades earlier, does.
Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett have made themselves laughable and the butt of countless jokes.
They don’t seem to get that America itself is in jeopardy and in danger of break up.
Restricting Federal Agencies regulatory overreach would be a great step in taking back Constitutional Freedoms.
What the country really needs is a thoroughgoing review of all the unenumerated powers Fedzilla has acquired since the Progressive era, especially the New Deal and "alphabet agency" creation in the 60s and 70s followed by Constitutional amendments to clearly outline and limit which of those powers the Fed gov gets to keep. Perhaps an Article V convention is really needed.
I am of the opinion that the 10th amendment should be interpreted as ... If it is not enumerated in the Constitution, (say healthcare such as vaccines and abortion) the authority to regulate or control falls to the individual states.
I am further of the opinion that any law or regulation that infringes on a citizen’s right in the Constitution must pass “Strict scrutiny” in order to be lawful.
Then do Wickard v Filburn and Miller.
L
Somebody’s got to do it.
I not only want these 2 cases to smack the administrative state between the eyes with a 2x4, but I have long pined for the reversal of Wickard v. Filburn. I know that this will likely not occur this session (if ever), but this make up of the Court gives us the best shot in a long time. It is utterly absurd that Wickard ruled that the feds can regulate anything and everything under the Sun, so long as some incredibly tenuous relationship to “interstate commerce” can be alleged. It is an open invitation to complete federal dominance over the commerce of the entire nation - and since that ruling, the feds have disgustingly used that invitation for all that it is worth.