Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PJ-Comix

I think it is a good start source for history before 2000 and obscure topics like the Polish zUkranian War of 1919. I think that tends to be apolitical. Current stuff, especially political, probably not so much.


8 posted on 01/01/2022 11:32:43 AM PST by bravo whiskey (Count Rostov "The tyranny of indistinguishable days.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bravo whiskey

That’s the key. I’m OK with using Wikipedia for factual matters that haven’t been politicized. Anything that’s at all political, though, forget it. Big-time bias.


10 posted on 01/01/2022 11:41:04 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: bravo whiskey

‘I think it is a good start source for history...’

I went to wikipedia for some info on the evolution of Romance languages from Late Latin; it was highly informative...and since I was not under orders to use only primary sources and submit a formalized bibliography, I’m glad it was there...


28 posted on 01/01/2022 4:16:34 PM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: bravo whiskey

There is little more political than War, which to use a term from I believe von Clauswitz, is politics by other means.


30 posted on 01/02/2022 8:48:43 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson