Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/30/2021 8:55:18 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

A “free market”, by definition, does not give insider information to a select few.


2 posted on 12/30/2021 8:57:04 PM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope she enjoys her 30 pieces of silver.


3 posted on 12/30/2021 9:01:37 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Okay, if they can trade, considering their positions, how about they be required to publicly disclose all trades within 24 hours. Maybe a Congressional log that the public can see.


4 posted on 12/30/2021 9:06:07 PM PST by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Someday in the not too distant future we will be able to sing this song:

Can't come soon enough.

5 posted on 12/30/2021 9:07:01 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband cashed in on Big Tech just as Congress was set to pounce

BY SOPHIE MELLOR, Fortune, July 8, 2021 8:26 AM EDT

The week before the House Judiciary Committee voted on reigning in big tech, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband exercised a bullish bet on Google-parent Alphabet, in a timely transaction that netted him $5.3 million.

The antitrust bill was advanced as a push by the government to curb the “unregulated power” of big tech firms Google, Amazon, Apple and Facebook. It was the final part of a six-part package called “Ending Platform Monopolies Act” aimed at restricting how big tech companies offer their products to ensure they don’t use their size to dominate the market.

However, despite its good intentions, the market reaction to the judiciary panel approving the legislation was muted—shares in big tech companies in fact rose after investors found the House proposal to be no real threat.

Paul Pelosi, who bought 4,000 shares of Alphabet on June 18 (as revealed in a financial disclosure signed by Nancy Pelosi and filed on July 2), made an initial $4.8 million gain from Alphabet’s rising share price, and has since seen his gain grow to $5.3 million.

Paul bought the stock by exercising a call option, which allows investors to speculate on stocks they do not own by entering into a contract that allows them to buy a stock at a later date at a promised price. The upshot: a call option is a good tool for an investor who believes the stock price will go up in the future. In Pelosi’s case, the call options he’d previously bought for Alphabet (which were due to expire the day of his purchase) allowed him to buy it at $1,200 a share while the shares closed that day just over $2,500, a difference that accounted for his profit.

Paul Pelosi also reported buying call options for Amazon, Apple and NVIDIA, but he did not report exercising them.

Nancy Pelosi’s spokesperson said “The speaker has no involvement or prior knowledge of these transactions,” in an emailed statement on Wednesday, adding that Speaker Pelosi doesn’t own any stock.

Capitol gains
Great stock timing in DC isn’t exactly novel. Republican senators Richard Burr and Kelly Loeffler had inside knowledge of the impending COVID-19 crisis when they sold shares in January 2020.

Burr sold $1.7 million worth of stock holdings, while the former senator, Loeffler, wife of New York Stock Exchange chairman Jeffrey Sprecher and richest member of Congress at the time, unloaded up to $3.1 million worth of stock after getting closed-door briefings on the COVID-19 threat.

It is illegal for Congress members to trade based on non-public information gathered during their official duties, but it is hard to charge members of Congress with insider trading. Neither Burr not Loeffler faced any charges following inquiries.

But while it is hard to prosecute politicians over such stock sales, Twitter is less forgiving. ‘Nancy Pelosi Insider Trading’ began to trend on the social media service and people have called for her removal from office.


10 posted on 12/30/2021 10:01:27 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bahroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I don’t get it, to be honest. How much does one need?

The Pelosi’s are worth over 100 million, by some estimates. When does one realistically decide that they have enough? Or is the goal really just to grab all you can. While to you can? That does indeed seem to be the case.

13 posted on 12/30/2021 10:18:52 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Never do anything illegal, when you are doing something illegal. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Jhn 12:4 - But one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, who would betray Him, said,

Jhn 12:5 - “Why was this fragrant oil not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?”

Jhn 12:6 - This he said,

not that he cared for the poor,

but because he was a thief,

and had the money box;

and he used to take what was put in it.

Nancy’s ilk has been around a long time.


18 posted on 12/31/2021 4:41:10 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson