Skip to comments.
Ohio Health Department Won’t Say Which Version of Pfizer Vaccine It Is Distributing
The Ohio Star ^
| December 17, 2021
| Peter D'Abrosca
Posted on 12/17/2021 9:10:33 AM PST by CheshireTheCat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
If it's Friday, your government is lying to you.
To: Lowell1775
2
posted on
12/17/2021 9:11:08 AM PST
by
CheshireTheCat
("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
To: CheshireTheCat
That’s curious.
It shouldn’t matter if they’re the same formulation, right?
3
posted on
12/17/2021 9:12:33 AM PST
by
Skywise
To: CheshireTheCat
Keeps one from researching
4
posted on
12/17/2021 9:14:00 AM PST
by
no-to-illegals
( The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them)
To: Skywise
Legally distinct. The EUA version is immune from prosecution. The other isn’t available.
5
posted on
12/17/2021 9:17:22 AM PST
by
fretzer
To: CheshireTheCat
The two vaccines are chemically, molecularly, and biologically identical. (Pfizer and the FDA (which sets the rules) has said so.)
The label and marketing is different. There is a legal difference that may affect liability and indemnification.
This is a non-story, or at least, the author gives no indication why it matters.
6
posted on
12/17/2021 9:21:49 AM PST
by
bhl
To: bhl
He probably doesn’t want Google to remove The Ohio Star or for it to lose whatever presence it has on social media.
7
posted on
12/17/2021 9:24:23 AM PST
by
CheshireTheCat
("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
To: Skywise
Its the liability. For the EAU version Pfizer is immune from being sued for deaths and injuries. Also Rueters reported recently that it had found evidence that the reason illegals aren’t getting jabbed is because they might be able to sue even for even for EAU. Ironically the tone of the Reuters story was that this was being mean to the poor illegals...while my attitude is they are lucky.
To: fretzer
Exactly.
That why they don’t want to release the labeling (or, any) info.
9
posted on
12/17/2021 9:31:07 AM PST
by
Jane Long
(What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 )
To: Skywise
They can be sued for the Comirnaty fake vz because it is not under the EUA,
10
posted on
12/17/2021 9:34:26 AM PST
by
dforest
(Freaking insane world. )
To: dforest
11
posted on
12/17/2021 9:35:10 AM PST
by
dforest
(Freaking insane world. )
To: CheshireTheCat
“Informed consent” takes another beating.
12
posted on
12/17/2021 9:35:30 AM PST
by
cld51860
(We’re doomed.)
To: CheshireTheCat
Continuing proof, as if it were needed, that CoupFlu has NEVER been about public health.
And that informed consent is IMPOSSIBLE.
13
posted on
12/17/2021 9:36:21 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
To: CheshireTheCat
If it's Friday, your government is lying to you. If it’s a day that ends in “Y”, your government is lying to you!
14
posted on
12/17/2021 9:36:30 AM PST
by
zipper
(In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
To: bhl
The two vaccines are chemically, molecularly, and biologically identical. (Pfizer and the FDA (which sets the rules) has said so.) The label and marketing is different. There is a legal difference that may affect liability and indemnification. This is a non-story, or at least, the author gives no indication why it matters.It’s the difference between informed consent, and uninformed coercion, especially for military members who are required to take an experimental “vaccine” under duress. It’s ILLEGAL, and the military is telling them it’s not illegal, that it’s Comirnaty when it’s not — and I read a judge slapped the Pentagon down over it.
The Nuremberg code is not “optional” for any government or private entity.
15
posted on
12/17/2021 9:53:15 AM PST
by
zipper
(In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
To: bhl
“The label and marketing is different. There is a legal difference that may affect liability and indemnification.
This is a non-story, or at least, the author gives no indication why it matters.”
I’ve heard that before but it doesn’t make sense. Maybe there’s a bit more to the story.
To: CheshireTheCat
“None of your business what injection we want to force you to accept...” or “We would like the public to keep accepting an injection you THINK includes liability but for which no one is liable”
17
posted on
12/17/2021 10:09:53 AM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
18
posted on
12/17/2021 10:10:27 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: bhl
This is a non-story, or at least, the author gives no indication why it matters.
I think the "name brand" Comirnaty doesn't have the blanket legal protection the emergency use version does. So basically the state is withholding a key fact that could aid one of its citizens should they get injured from the vax. The state protecting a pharma company over the little people that fund it. Brandon's America.
19
posted on
12/17/2021 10:10:28 AM PST
by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: bhl
It matters because only ONE version of the jab is fully approved. According to EUA regulations, there should be NO emergency use drugs available once there is an approved version. I don’t know why J&J’s and Moderna’s are still available either.
20
posted on
12/17/2021 10:14:02 AM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson