Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DFG

Insider trading is against the law; politicians always get a heads up on what’s happening, or will.


7 posted on 12/15/2021 2:20:10 PM PST by SkyDancer ( I make airplanes fly, what's your super power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SkyDancer

“Insider trading is against the law; politicians always get a heads up on what’s happening, or will.”

Very specifically, it is NOT against the law for Congressmen to trade on insider information. It’s good to make the laws.


11 posted on 12/15/2021 2:22:51 PM PST by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer

The classic example is Martha Stewart going to jail for the same thing they routinely get away with.


18 posted on 12/15/2021 2:27:35 PM PST by Leep (Save America. Lock down pres. Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: All

Forbes.com EDITORS’ PICK | Jul 8, 2021

Inside Nancy Pelosi’s Husband’s $5 Million Alphabet Options Windfall

Did Paul Pelosi, the financier husband of House Speaker Nancy, profit off of insider Beltway scuttlebutt in June to make about $5 million on options contracts tied to Alphabet’s stock?

On Wednesday evening, Bloomberg News published a report titled “Pelosi’s Husband Locked In $5.3 Million From Alphabet Options,” which carried the subheadlines, “Action was week before House panel considered antitrust bills,” and “Antitrust bills target Alphabet’s Google, Apple, Amazon.”

The story followed a Fox Business News piece looking at Pelosi’s June trades, which were laid out in a July 2 disclosure form.

Both stories raise a connection between Pelosi’s trades in Alphabet and a House Judiciary Committee’s vote on a number of antitrust efforts aimed at big technology titans like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Microsoft. Some of the bills, which advanced from the subcommittee in July, aim to limit the market power or break up the companies entirely. After politically charged investigations of Senators’ stock trades in 2020 at the onset of the Coronavirus crisis, sleuths now comb the financial disclosure forms of congressional leaders for hints of insider trading.

When asked by Bloomberg, Speaker Pelosi’s spokesperson Drew Hamill said, “The speaker has no involvement or prior knowledge of these transactions.”

So was there anything improper about Mr. Pelosi’s trades? A few critical details indicate not. In fact, the story seems to be that he made one heck of a trade.

The trades in question involve 40 call options on Alphabet’s stock at a strike price of $1,200, which were exercised on June 18, a few days before the House subcommittee convened. The contracts gave Pelosi the right to convert his 40 call options into 4,000 Alphabet shares at a price of $1,200. Because Alphabet was trading at about $2,550 when the options were exercised and converted into stock, they were in the money and are now worth about $5.4 million.

Left out in the Bloomberg piece is an important detail. Mr. Pelosi had to make the trade.

His options were set to expire on June 18, 2021, according to the disclosure report, the day when he exercised them. In fact, Pelosi only had two choices: Sell his options, or exercise them. If he did nothing, his brokerage would likely have closed or exercised the options anyway. Thus, Pelosi’s Alphabet trade on June 18 was an inevitability, whether the House subcommittee was meeting, or not.

Regardless, the trade is quite a windfall. Instead of some insider dope, he seems to have made a string of gutty trades that generated millions in profits.

The options in question were acquired on February 27, 2020, just as global financial markets began their Coronavirus-induced plunge. On that trading day, Alphabet fell as low as $1,314 a share, where it closed.

Pelosi, apparently bullish on the company’s search and advertising businesses, bought slightly in the money options expiring about sixteen months later. In an option, a trader pays an initial premium to gain the right to buy 100 shares of an underlying stock at a predetermined price in a specified period of time. The premiums can be a cheap way to gain exposure to a lot of stock.

In the case of Alphabet, Pelosi nailed it: His premiums may have only cost a few hundred thousand dollars. He rode out the March 2020 plunge in global markets as the world entered lockdown and he held his Alphabet options as long as possible, benefitting from the company’s 40%-plus gain in 2021.

Other trades in the disclosure report look like big winners. On Feb. 20, 2021, he purchased 100 calls in Microsoft at a strike price of $140 expiring in March 2021. When the market fell further, he added 150 more contracts with a $130 strike, also expiring in March 2021. By expiration, Microsoft’s stock had shot up 75% to about $230.

Pelosi seems to deploy a LEAP option strategy of building low-cost exposure to a few large-cap tech stocks using options, buying slightly in-the-money contracts expiring in 12-to-18 months.

New trades Pelosi has made such as calls in semiconductor Nvidia, e-commerce giant Amazon, and iPhone-maker Apple are already making money.


35 posted on 12/15/2021 2:52:45 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathnroom to uwe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer

It’s against the law for them now as well. Obama in 2012 signed a law prohibiting them from cashing in but he damn well knew they would keep doing it.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOCK_Act


57 posted on 12/16/2021 4:06:41 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson