Posted on 12/15/2021 5:07:51 AM PST by Red Badger
In a letter to the Department of Justice last year, an anonymous Democrat whistleblower accused fellow Democrats in Pima County, Arizona of adding approximately 35,000 votes to each of the Democrat candidates in the 2020 election.
This information came out Monday, during an “ad hoc” hearing in Tucson, where Arizona State House and Senate members met to discuss election integrity issues in Pima County.
During the hearing, experts provided evidence and testimony about the voting irregularities that allegedly took place during the election, including ballots from people not living where they voted, and inflated voter rolls across the Democrat-leaning county.
Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem, who has received Trump’s endorsement for Arizona Secretary of State in 2022, read the letter. It was dated November 10, 2020, and addressed to the Criminal Division of the DOJ.
Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.
In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals.
When I asked, “How in the world would 35,000 votes be kept hidden, or from being discovered?” It was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the total registered vote range and will not exceed the registered voter count. And the 35,000 was determined allowable for Pima County based on our county registered voter count.
It was also stated total voter turnout versus total registered voters determined how many votes we can embed. The embedding will also adjust based on voter turnout. Because the embedded votes are distributed sporadically, all embedded votes will not be found if audited because embeds are in groups of approximately 1,000. This is so the County Recorder can declare an oversight issue or error, as a group of 1,000 is a normal and acceptable error.
Maricopa County’s embed totals will be substantially larger than Pima, due to embeds being calculated based on the total number of registered voters. When I asked, “Has this ever been tested, and how do we know it works?” the response was, yes, this has been tested and has shown significant success in Arizona judicial retention elections, since 2014. Even undetectable in post audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes and the full potential of the total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters. This year our Secretary of State has removed precinct level detail from election night releases, so candidates can’t see precinct over-votes.
This is what I have from this meeting. Just thought I’d report this. Not sure if you can do anything since I was unable to have a recording device at this meeting. Thank You.’
The whistleblower reportedly said he/she wished to remain anonymous and not be included any investigation.
Finchem said lawmakers were copied on the email, and over the ensuing months, they executed a “very quiet, but fruitful investigation.”
He also said that his team was able to verify that the IP address of the computer that sent the email is in Tucson, Arizona, but unfortunately, they wee not able to verify the identity of the whistleblower. Joe Biden’s DOJ reportedly refuses to investigate the allegations.
During the hearing, election experts described other potential election shenanigans in Pima County.
For instance, in the small town of Sells, Arizona, 1,375 residents were determined to be of “voting age.” However, 2,762 people were registered to vote in the town – more than double the voting age population.
Topawa, Arizona
Voting Age Population: 182
Registered "Voters": 288
158% Registration Rate
With single locations having 173 registered "voters" pic.twitter.com/N7j8KrITEO
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 13, 2021
The same thing happened in Topawa, another small town in Pima County, where 182 people were considered to be of “voting age” in the town of roughly 400 residents. Somehow, 288 people were reported as registered voters.
Topawa, Arizona
Voting Age Population: 182
Registered "Voters": 288
158% Registration Rate
With single locations having 173 registered "voters" pic.twitter.com/N7j8KrITEO
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 13, 2021
Pima County election canvassers also discovered that out of 172 homes in Pima County, 62 early ballots were sent to the elections department from an address where the “voter” did not live, an error rate of 52 percent.
WOW.
Canvass of 172 homes in Pima County found 62 early ballots where voter is not a resident
45 PERCENT were potentially fraudulent
And only 52% of houses responded pic.twitter.com/9HlchzmKjS
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 13, 2021
A college fraternity house was also found to have 27 registered voters with an average age of 45 years old.
Frat house in Arizona has 27 registered voters.
Their average age?
45. pic.twitter.com/qTCM97RRmj
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 13, 2021
Monday’s hearing occurred following an election analysis from October reporting that thousands of Pima County’s mail-in votes could be fraudulent.
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, a systems scientist involved in the state’s forensic audit, reported two Pima County precincts had over 100 percent turnout with mail-in ballots in 2020, an impossible phenomenon.
Pima County’s mail-in return rate was 15 percent higher than the 71 percent national average, and 19 percent higher than all of the other counties in Arizona.
Precincts that reported a 92 percent mail-in return rate or higher represented 264,000 votes. If just two percent of those were fictitious in favor of Joe Biden, then President Trump would win Arizona.
Pima County’s hearing also comes amid the audit of Maricopa County’s election results, which reported more than 57,000 ballots having irregularities.
Finchem has called for a forensic audit of the entire state’s election results. “The overriding thing that folks have to remember: elections belong to the people, they do not belong to the government,” he said in an interview with Real America’s Voice before the hearing.
VIDEO AT LINK..................
Dr. Kelli Ward, Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party, gave an brief synopsis of the discrepancies found in the Southern Arizona county.
VIDEO AT LINK..................
President Trump said in a statement that the analysis of the 2020 election in Pima County, revealing “staggering anomalies and fictitious votes” proves that the election was rigged and stolen from the Republicans.
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America pic.twitter.com/Vle58GTSIe
— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) October 15, 2021
This is why the AP came out with that story yesterday about no fraud found in the 2020 Presidential election.
Those left wing ba$tards knew this news was coming out.
Anonymous source, and not able to identify a single vote that was changed or added.
This corroborates this kind of ‘Rat padding to ‘Rats that occurred in NH. In the news about a year ago, I recall the number 300 being padded in.
Mark Kelly’s election alone steals the entire US Senate. Both Georgia’s Senate seats were likely stolen, also John James in Michigan is likely the rightful Senate winner.
Would they really be so brazen as to call a bunch of people to a meeting (even if all Dems) & lay out a plan for fraud & just assume no one would speak out? This would seem to be a ‘need to know’ situation. Not something you call a meeting about.
Organized crime covers their tracks and they are good at it. This is organized crime.
And this is how it works. Here is a great story about how
“(Video) More Than DOUBLE Registered Voters
than Town Population – Pima County 2020
Election Integrity Hearing Provides Evidence
Of Thousands Of Fraudulent Votes” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/video-double-registered-voters-town-population-pima-county-2020-election-integrity-hearing-provides-evidence-thousands-fraudulent-votes/
The democrats went ALL OUT... blew all their vote fraud capital.. to elect JOE BIDEN???
Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes.................
RICO
Hundreds, if not thousands of people had to be involved in setting up all this fraud.
It had to be ordered from above
35,000 embedded false votes to Biden one county in AZ.
10,457 vote margin Biden Trump.
No, to stop Donald Trump. Biden is, of course, a puppet, and with control of both Houses, they can do almost anything that the puppet masters want to do. Soros and Xi in that group.
This is so frustrating. The fact that they would allow 1000 votes to be within “error”, OMG, it should be ZERO. Our country is lost and there are so many idiots out there that have NO CLUE and worse, don’t care.
Your statement is false. If there are more votes than voting age Americans, fraud is proven.
The horses are out of the barn. Tracking down exactly which votes are false is irrelevant since the entire election is contaminated with fraud.
If the Republicans keep doing this play-by-the-rules crap and doing audits for 2 years after the fraud already occured and the election is over, then this country is going to die. Instead, I pray it splits up in the multiple regions. The South will truly rise again.
As predicted in Robert Heinlein's novel Friday............... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friday_(novel)
Liz Harrington is one of the canvas leaders that is revealing the amount of fraud which in this case of Pima County is enough to reverse the outcome. But canvassing doesn’t show which way the fraud went. Only a forensic inspection of the ballots themselves can reveal which ballots are fraudulent. Once the fraud ballot counts are revealed and backed out of the totals, then the remaining counts will determine the true outcome.
To summarize, the canvas points to where a forensic exam of the physical paper ballots must be done.
But all counties must have a canvas to see which must have their ballots examined.
Meanwhile, the fraud cabal in power is running out the clock.
By federal law, ballots and all election materials must be protected for 22 months post-election.
The criminal syndicate that is running out the clock has until September 3rd, 2022 to cover up their fraud, then they are legally authorized to destroy 2020 election ballots, data and materials UNLESS ordered by a court of appropriate jurisdiction to preserve the election materials past the 22 month limitation.
And what you say is useless.
We went through a “forensic audit” with Cyber Nitwits in Maricopa County. After 7 million dollars they didn’t change a single vote.
Oh, now the problem is in Pima county!
Hopium dopium.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.