I think we already know the outcome on the challenge to Roe v. Wade

Bookwormroom.com ^ | 12-1-2021 | Bookworm

[servo1969]

[Rennes Templar]

“on matters of minor importance, they’re rather consistently conservative while, on matters of importance to the left, enough of them will side with the leftist justices to achieve the preferred leftist outcome.”

Yup. Compromised.

[dsrtsage]

Women need to safely be able to hide cheating with the alphas from the beta bill paying husbands

[Political Junkie Too]

Who is Justice Robertson?

-PJ

[1Old Pro]

This is one of those situations in which I hope I'm wrong. I seldom am, though, when I suspect the worst of our institutions.

So true these days. I could give 100 examples.

[The people have spoken]

Three times he refers to Roberts as Robertson. That costs him credibility.

[precisionshootist]

Red States need to just forget about the federal court system including SCOTUS. They should handle abortion and all second amendment issues within the state and tell the federal government to get lost.

SCOTUS is a complete joke.

[the OlLine Rebel]

Yeah, what a moron.

But, I’m afraid the end result is correct.

[KTM rider]

This challenge to Roe v Wade could be related to the COVID 19 scam.

How can a woman have "the right to choose" homicide, but be required to take the jab ! ( and don't men have equal rights with women ? )

[bankwalker]

This challenge to Roe v Wade could be related to the COVID 19 scam.

... or the amendment 19 scam ...

[hinckley buzzard]

Yeah, kind of destroys credibility when you get the name of the chief justice wrong, while holding yourself out as an expert on the SC. Swing and a miss, but thanks for playing.

[plain talk]

“Another reason for my certainty about the inevitable decision affirming Roe v. Wade is that I read somewhere (and I can’t remember where)”

LOL

[Rusty0604]

Consistently got the name wrong.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

#4: "Who is Justice Robertson?"

Yeah, I stopped reading right there. If he can't get that right then he doesn't know what he's talking about.

As for Barrett, I have no doubt she will vote against Roe vs Wade. That is in her DNA. Kavanaugh? Well if he followed the tenents of his religion, he'd vote against Roe vs Wade too.

[karnage]

I think the Supreme Court will do the right thing.

[OrioleFan]

Pelosi has nine mail in ballots ready for the 3am flip.

[unixfox]

How can a woman have "the right to choose" homicide, but be required to take the jab !

And why can't women have the right to be a prostitute, use illegal drugs, etc,etc.??

It is THEIR body isn't it? As usual, they want double standards.

[peggybac]

Brandon, actually answering questions today, said when asked about the arguments today, that abortion was the only rational answer. So, killing babies is rational? May he rot in Hell.

[InterceptPoint]

Nonsense.

The Court will rule in favor of Mississippi. The only real question is whether that ruling will just be an OK to the reduction of the 23-24 week Roe v. Wade threshold to 15 weeks or an acknowledgment that abortion law should be under the jurisdiction of the individual states.

A 15 week ruling would infer the rights of individual states to legislate abortion law but, IMHO, would still fall short of a total rejection of Roe v. Wade. But a States Rights ruling, while much preferred, still seems like a long-shot to me.

Fingers crossed.

[BfloGuy]

Three times he refers to Roberts as Robertson. That costs him credibility.

He is a she. Her blog is consistently excellent.

Her mistake about Roberts is just that — a mistake.