Posted on 11/02/2021 8:23:15 AM PDT by MattMusson
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
Readson # 298 I ain’t gettin’ it
This is a coverup.
According to John Hopkins, full FDA approval takes place when enough data demonstrate that the vaccines are safe and effective for MOST PEOPLE who receive them, and when the FDA has had an opportunity to review and approve the whole vaccine manufacturing process and facilities.
Basically, this means a certain percentage of the receivers of the vaccine are expected to be harmed. So it is my thought that to stay out of illegalities, it is safer to blame deaths on a bad batch to protect the company from admitting the above and placing themselves into the line of fire.
Someone has to fall on their sword to get away with the scam. If you make it the packaging and shipping people, the main part of the money generating is protected. If this is the case, then the vaccine was just as deadly to a percentage of the ill as the ones who died even though that was less than 3% nationally and numbers you will never find could be higher than that.
So it isn’t a cure for everyone, it is a gamble for some and they are not able to be identified. The cure is no different than the virus for those people. How many bullets are in the gun when you put it to your head...zero or five? And only the gun, which can’t act, knows.
wy69
Meanwhile, they still have not pulled these deadly drugs off the market when other SARS drugs killed only 25 people and they pulled the drugs.
We've had 225M people receive at least one dose. How many deaths would you expect in 225M unvaccinated people in that same time period?
Compared to how many deaths from all other vaccines?
From what I've heard it's many more. In fact, I'd be stunned if it wasn't.
We've administered over 400M shots in less than a year. We've never done anything close to that with a new vaccine.
Of course your going to have more reports of effects even if the rate isn't higher. I think people are also much more likely to report an adverse event following a controversial new vaccine, like Covid, than if they'd experienced the same event following their tetanus or flu shots.
If you have heart issues 2 weeks after your tetanus shot you're not likely to report it to VAERS but you may very well do so after your Covid shot.
How many of the 9,143 would have died of Covid-19 without the vaccine?
That's exactly the right question, and the people who's job it is to track these things say there isn't a higher death rate in the vaccinated.
You may say they're lying and it's a gigantic conspiracy but that's where we are.
So now they’re going to claim “bad batches” are to blame, not the technology. No sale.
be assured, if they didn't get you this time, if allowed, they'll get you with the booster.....
this is murder....this is what they're mandating....
when will people wake up....
The part about certain lots to certain states needs to be investigated, which states got which bad batches ?
Can some of you who are better at graphs and statistics and so forth break this down a little? I get the gist of what the Ticker Guy is saying, and to me it looks horrifying.
Some excerpts here, but please, read the whole thing.
Uh, That’s Not A Conspiracy Theory
There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number.
What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them — in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned. That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads. What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply disturbing.
Now let’s talk about VAERS. You can grab the public data from it, but VAERS intentionally makes it difficult to discern differences in lot outcomes. Why? Because they separate out the specifics of the vax (the manufacturer, lot number, etc.) into a different file. This means that simply loading it into Excel does you no good and attempting to correlate and match the two tables in Excel itself is problematic due to the extreme size of the files — in fact, it blew Excel up here when I tried to do it.
We know VAERS understates adverse events because it while it is allegedly “mandatory” it is subject to clinical judgment and there is a wild bias against believing that these jabs, or any jab for that matter, has bad side effects. In addition there is neither a civil or criminal penalty of any kind for failure to report. We now know some people who have had bad side effects from the Covid-19 jabs have shown up on social media after going to the doctor and then tried to find their own record, which is quite easy to do if you know the lot number from your card, what happened and the date the event happened — their doctor never filed it. This does not really surprise me since filing those reports takes quite a bit of time and the doctor isn’t paid for it by the government or anyone else, so even without bias there will be those who simply won’t do the work unless there are severe penalties for not doing so. There are in fact no penalties whatsoever. The under-reporting does not have a reliable boundary on it, but estimates are that only somewhere between 3% and 10% of actual adverse events get into the database. That’s right — at best the adverse event rate is ten times that of what you find in VAERS.
But now it gets interesting because VAERS, it appears, was also deliberately set up to make it hard for ordinary people to find a future correlation between injury or death and vaccine lot number.
What the actual **** is going on here? You’re going to try to tell me that the CDC, NIH and FDA don’t know about this? I can suck this data into a database, run 30 seconds of queries against it and instantly identify a wildly-elevated death and hazard rate associated with certain lot numbers when the distribution of those associations should be normal, or at least something close to it, across all the lots produced and used? Then I look to try to find the obvious potential “clean” explanation (the higher death rate lot could have gone into older people) it’s simply not there when one looks at all adverse event reports. I have Moderna lots with the same average age of persons who died but ten times times the number of associated deaths.
Oh if you’re interested the nastiest lot was literally everywhere in terms of states reporting adverse events against it; no, they didn’t concentrate them in one state or region either.
The outcome distribution isn’t “sort of close” when most of the lots have a single-digit number of associated deaths.
What do we have here folks?
Is there something inherent in the production of the “instructions”, however they’re delivered, that results in a non-deterministic outcome within a batch of jabs which was not controlled for, perhaps because it isn’t understood SINCE WE HAVE NEVER DONE THIS BEFORE IN MAN OR BEAST and if it goes wrong you’re ****ed?
Have doctors been told to stop reporting? Note that HHS can issue such an order under the PREP Act and there is no judicial review if they do that. Did they?
This demands an explanation. Three different firms all using spike proteins, two using a different technology than the third, all three causing the body to produce the spike rather than deliver it directly and all three of them have a wild skew of some lots that hose people left and right while the others, statistically, do not screw people.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109
Oh goody ! ../sar
That means that if you get a bad batch of vaccine,
you are almost two times as likely to die from your vaccine choice,
than you are from the disease itself (covid survival = 98.4%). At what point is the vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself ?
Cutter Labs and the Polio Vaccine situation again.
Now, this is what I always thought was the cause of bad vaccine reactions deaths. Not the vaccine itself, but contamination and bad quality control in general.
Yup—Russian roulette.
You have to take the jab to find out what is in it.
I think we are looking at “all of the above”...
But—for individuals it is an easy call.
Just _no_.
bkmk
That is it.
Well at least we’re safe from hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Has zinc, C and D3 been taken off the market yet?
The reported deaths are usually within days of the vaccination, and they often occur among young, healthy people. In addition to deaths, the onset of adverse effects often comes within hours of the vaccination, making a cause-effect relationship very likely. Almost everybody knows, or has experienced themselves, strong effects such as severe body aches, rashes, headaches, fatigue, and nausea.
“Vaccines” (aka the mRNA gene therapies) now the number one cause of coincidence.
Slo-kill is a lot easier to get away with.
I don’t think any of this is by chance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.