“And then he touted the vaccine as being low risk, causing about 50 fatalities per million, compared to auto accidents causing 150 per million!”
Thank you for expanding. Any idea what source he was using for the 50 fatalities figure? I’d like for it to be spread around. I am surprised it would be published anywhere.
I think 50 is lowballing the fatality risk. But even if that number is accurate and so is the number for auto accidents, most of which I understand occur less than 30 miles from home, it’s not as if people can avoid being in vehicles and really have much of a life or fulfill one’s obligations. After all, one has to get into a car (or bus, which still can have an accident) to go visit mom in the nursing home to make sure they are treating her right.
One can avoid the risk of the vaccine by not taking it.
My aunt argued to a friend that 10K people have died from the vaccine. The friend thought that was fine because of all the people who are saved, such as elderly people like herself. She saw no problem at all that people like that 37-year-old mom of young kids died from the clot shot.
Bingo. My document to them mentioned how this vaccine campaign specifically pitted a violence of the young against the elderly and flipped it into legitimizing a violence of the parents on the child, notably the usage of fetal stem cell to produce this vaccine. I said this is not a vaccine campaign but an evil child rape ideology campaign, putting me up to the wall of accepting a treatment using child abuse or be banned from work.