Posted on 09/18/2021 6:13:53 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
A “breakthrough case” is the term for a person infecting with COVID-19 after they have been vaccinated. On May 1st the CDC changed the recording and record keeping of COVID-19 breakthrough cases, and stopped tracking them. The change was announced July 30th {Data Link}.
[…] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitors hospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1. CDC presents this data in aggregate at the national level but not by state, and there is no single, public repository for data by state or data on breakthrough infections, since the CDC stopped monitoring them. (read more)
At the time the CDC stopped tracking the incidents of vaccinated persons contracting COVID-19 and being hospitalized, many people wondered why? Obviously if you stop recording vaccinated persons who are hospitalized, it will look like only unvaccinated persons are being hospitalized by the variants in the CDC records. That skews the data and gives the false impression that only unvaxxed persons are getting infected and/or sick….
…Which is exactly what happened.
The medical industry and media narrative around the COVID-19 Delta Variant was that unvaccinated people in the U.S. were the majority group at risk. The data supported that narrative because the breakthrough cases were no longer being recorded. This makes the vaccine approach look better. The approach of not counting the breakthrough case hospitalizations also makes the pharmaceutical companies look better; their vaccine looks more appealing & more effective.
However, another angle surfaced today that highlights the strength of the motive to stop recording those breakthrough cases; it also explains why some of the top leadership in the FDA quit their jobs rather than participate.
When the FDA vaccine approval panel was originally instructed to use the efficacy data with the goal of evaluating the booster shot request for the Pfizer vaccination; they were instructed to only look at the data from the U.S.
Knowing the CDC no longer was tracking U.S. breakthrough cases, that meant the FDA vaccine approval panel was only evaluating the Pfizer efficacy and hospitalization issue around the non-vaccinated group. If this approach had been maintained, they would be making a determination of vaccine efficacy/effectiveness in the U.S. with the key metric omitted: The Pfizer vaccine would look more effective than it actually was, because the vaccinated and hospitalized metric was removed.
That skewed data looks like an intentional decision – for that specific intentional reason. The CDC was trying to make the vaccines look more effective at avoiding hospitalization. THAT is a political manipulation by changing a key part of the record-keeping. THAT looks like the reason for the FDA officials to quit, rather than participate in politically manipulated science.
This scenario turned up today in the FDA rejection of a Pfizer booster, when the FDA vaccine approval panel finally won the argument and was allowed to look at more than just the manipulated U.S. data-set. Despite the CDC stopping to track the vaccinated and hospitalized data in the U.S., the panel was allowed to consider the vaccinated and hospitalized outcomes from the U.K. and Israel {Source Link}:
[Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA leading expert in vaccines,] – “added the meeting focused on almost real-time analyses compared to what is happening in the world, and the goal remains slowing the spread of COVID-19, which is killing almost 2,000 Americans daily.
The question the advisory panel was originally given to consider only used the U.S. data, a small dataset, despite the presentations including data from the U.K. and Israel.
Marks instructed the panel to consider all the data, noting, “This is not a legal proceeding, this is a science proceeding, so you can take all the data into account.” (link)
By looking at the vaccinated/hospitalized rates in the U.K and Israel, a data-set intentionally not recorded by U.S. health officials, the panel rejected the Pfizer request for a booster shot, noting the efficacy just wasn’t there. However, if the panel had only looked at the data approved by the CDC, the Pfizer vaccine efficacy would have looked much better because the vaccinated/hospitalized data was intentionally not recorded.
This my friends is how the healthcare of the U.S. is being manipulated by politics and Big Pharma.
Photo's and more at link
>> Figures never Lie, but Liars Figure
Exactly.
We should all be openly discussing the complexity of the data and its irregularities. But instead we suffering the force of irrational govt.
Totally agree.
Texas Fossil wrote: “None of the recognized doctors who are critical of how the Covid19 mess was handled are Anti-Vaxxers. There are legitimate issues with the mRNA treatments for Covid19. Unlike normal vaccines these do not prevent infection, and do not give protection when the virus mutates.”
Those ‘doctors’ are certainly anti-vaxxers. One of the oldest tricks on the internet is denying your background.
And, yes, those ‘treatments’ are vaccines, they do prevent infections, and they do give protection. They may not be 100% effective but name two or three vaccines that are.
I’d like to see a study, not a news report, but a study of the effects of ivermectin on COVID in India.
wjcsux wrote: “Big Pharma isn’t your friend.”
Neither are the anti-vaxxer websites where most of the material posted on Free Republic originate.
Nice label you have there to slap on anyone who disagrees with you.
It isn’t really debatable that companies will game the system and government agencies intended to manage that gaming get wholly captured by those same companies. It is one of the chief problems of bureaucracy.
And when you have a corrupt and incompetent president (and his entire administration), there is no check on it at all.
hopespringseternal wrote: “And when you have a corrupt and incompetent president (and his entire administration), there is no check on it at all.”
You are aware that Trump and his administration developed the vaccines?
“Those ‘doctors’ are certainly anti-vaxxers.”
NO.
Dr. Robert W. Malone holds patents on the mRNA vaccination process. He is not an anti-vaxer.
This is interviews since the Conference in Rome:
Medical Academics Are Speaking Out Against Fauci And The Biden Administration
https://rumble.com/vmo1i3-medical-academics-are-speaking-out-against-fauci-and-the-biden-administrati.html
Physicians And Scientists Sign ‘Rome Declaration’ Against Covid Vaccines
https://rumble.com/vmo1nd-physicians-and-scientists-sign-rome-declaration-against-covid-vaccines.html
The Undeniable Ivermectin Miracle in India’s 240m Populated Largest State, Uttar Pradesh – Horowitz
https://newsrescue.com/the-undeniable-ivermectin-miracle-indias-240m-populated-largest-state-uttar-pradesh-horowitz/
FACT:
In December my 95 year old father was diagnosed with Covid. He had lots of pre-conditions. 15+ years ago he had quadruple heart bypass surgery, 6 years ago he had a pacemaker put in, he had Pick’s disease. We took him to the doctor, they ran 2 Covid tests, and did chest Xrays and other lab tests. He tested negative on the quick Covid Test. They prescribed an antibiotic and heavy D-3. About a week later the PCR test came back positive. The doctor called in a prescription of Ivermectin. (3mg 4X / Day for 3 days) At the 4th day he no longer had any symptoms and was doing much better.
He did die in March, but he did not die of Covid. He died at home in his own bed. He simply stopped breathing.
This is not hear say, I with with him ever day for many years. He had 24 hour care at home for 5 years.
“Neither are the anti-vaxxer websites where most of the material posted on Free Republic originate.”
Which websites are you referring to? Be specific.
“Neither are the anti-vaxxer websites where most of the material posted on Free Republic originate.”
Which websites are you referring to? Be specific.
So? Trump made a lot of mistakes, mainly in the people he trusted. He also massively underestimated the scale of corruption of the government in general.
Development of the vaccine is one thing, mandating the vaccinate for everyone is quit another. As is commiting scientific and policy fraud.
A lot of people are now seeing there is a great deal of collusion between powerful companies and government. This symbiosis between corporate interests and government is the Nazi model of governance. It is fascism.
This does not make them "good." Had they been developed under Biden, this would not make them "bad."
It is my current understanding that this is the first time MRNA techniques were utilized to make this thing they are calling a "vaccine."
Is this correct?
DiogenesLamp wrote: “is the first time MRNA techniques were utilized to make this thing they are calling a “vaccine.””
I believe that is correct but that doesn’t make them inherently good/bad.
This is true, but it makes them unproven.
Caution with something that has not been tested adequately is what wise people would do.
From what i've read, mRNA is potentially very dangerous because it can causes cellular mutations. It's potentially like a carcinogenic on steroids.
DiogenesLamp wrote: “This is true, but it makes them unproven. Caution with something that has not been tested adequately is what wise people would do.”
Perhaps, but that ‘caution’ exposes you to other risks such as illnesses, hospitalizations, and death from COVID.
DiogenesLamp wrote: “From what i’ve read, mRNA is potentially very dangerous because it can causes cellular mutations. It’s potentially like a carcinogenic on steroids.”
You can find all sorts of speculation promulgated by the anti-vaxxer community who are always looking for new reasons to refuse the vaccines. I suggest you read this link from JohnsHopkins that addresses your concerns.
For example the mRNA vaccines do not enter the nucleus of the cell so they cannot change your DNA, mRNA technology wasn’t rushed, it’s been under development for more than 20 years, and it is safe and effective.
As for myself, I caught the bug last November and it was quite miserable for a week. I believe I caught it again about a month ago because the symptoms started out exactly the same, but didn't last nearly as long. A Covid test came back negative on the second bout, but it was positive last year.
I have read that the vaccinations cause particularly strong reactions to people who have already had the virus because the immune system immediately attacks the area of the injection.
In any case, i've read studies from Israel and Cambridge England which indicate natural immunity is significantly better than vaccine immunity.
For example the mRNA vaccines do not enter the nucleus of the cell so they cannot change your DNA, mRNA technology wasn’t rushed, it’s been under development for more than 20 years, and it is safe and effective.
Well I know that they've been using mRNA to manipulate the genes of various animals as in getting lab rats to glow with the jellyfish gene, but I have not been aware they have been doing anything with humans regarding it. Human tissue perhaps, but on actual people?
I'll look at your link.
DiogenesLamp wrote: “I have read that the vaccinations cause particularly strong reactions to people who have already had the virus because the immune system immediately attacks the area of the injection.”
You can find lots of speculation.
DiogenesLamp wrote: “In any case, i’ve read studies from Israel and Cambridge England which indicate natural immunity is significantly better than vaccine immunity.”
From what I’ve read ‘natural immunity’ is better than vaccine immunity. But, I’ve also read that ‘natural immunity’ plus the vaccine is best of all.
+1.
Big Pharma is obviously going to make Big Money since Covid, like flu will need annual type vaccine efforts. I started thinking about the failure to find an AIDS vaccine (something Fauci has been involved with). I think that an AIDS vaccine might be a long period one like polio, mumps and measles. Therefore, is it possible that Big Pharma has decided they make a lot more money with multiple drug treatment for the lifetime of the AIDS patient than they would from an effective vaccine? Anyone have more information related to this?
There are already successful treatments for covid, which utilize already FDA approved and cheaper medications,
that the NIH/CDC/FDA haven't even investigated.
These medications are not yet approved for "off label" usage for covid, nor are there any funded studies.
Who funds the studies and reasearch: NIH/ FDA/ Fauxxi
To my mind, the lack of study research in these alternative medications is purposeful and intentional,
in order to keep "the jab" under UEA (Under Emergency Authorization), and thus provide The Big Pharma Cartel with a big pay-out.
Notice that the covid drug Cormidity (Pfizer) has liability, but won't be available in the US until 2023.
Notice that the covid drug ("the jab")(by Pfizer & Moderna)) indemnifies from liability and is only approved (UEA) since there is no other approved covid medication.
Nor is there any rush to approve an alternative medication protocol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.