Posted on 09/18/2021 6:13:53 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
A “breakthrough case” is the term for a person infecting with COVID-19 after they have been vaccinated. On May 1st the CDC changed the recording and record keeping of COVID-19 breakthrough cases, and stopped tracking them. The change was announced July 30th {Data Link}.
[…] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitors hospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1. CDC presents this data in aggregate at the national level but not by state, and there is no single, public repository for data by state or data on breakthrough infections, since the CDC stopped monitoring them. (read more)
At the time the CDC stopped tracking the incidents of vaccinated persons contracting COVID-19 and being hospitalized, many people wondered why? Obviously if you stop recording vaccinated persons who are hospitalized, it will look like only unvaccinated persons are being hospitalized by the variants in the CDC records. That skews the data and gives the false impression that only unvaxxed persons are getting infected and/or sick….
…Which is exactly what happened.
The medical industry and media narrative around the COVID-19 Delta Variant was that unvaccinated people in the U.S. were the majority group at risk. The data supported that narrative because the breakthrough cases were no longer being recorded. This makes the vaccine approach look better. The approach of not counting the breakthrough case hospitalizations also makes the pharmaceutical companies look better; their vaccine looks more appealing & more effective.
However, another angle surfaced today that highlights the strength of the motive to stop recording those breakthrough cases; it also explains why some of the top leadership in the FDA quit their jobs rather than participate.
When the FDA vaccine approval panel was originally instructed to use the efficacy data with the goal of evaluating the booster shot request for the Pfizer vaccination; they were instructed to only look at the data from the U.S.
Knowing the CDC no longer was tracking U.S. breakthrough cases, that meant the FDA vaccine approval panel was only evaluating the Pfizer efficacy and hospitalization issue around the non-vaccinated group. If this approach had been maintained, they would be making a determination of vaccine efficacy/effectiveness in the U.S. with the key metric omitted: The Pfizer vaccine would look more effective than it actually was, because the vaccinated and hospitalized metric was removed.
That skewed data looks like an intentional decision – for that specific intentional reason. The CDC was trying to make the vaccines look more effective at avoiding hospitalization. THAT is a political manipulation by changing a key part of the record-keeping. THAT looks like the reason for the FDA officials to quit, rather than participate in politically manipulated science.
This scenario turned up today in the FDA rejection of a Pfizer booster, when the FDA vaccine approval panel finally won the argument and was allowed to look at more than just the manipulated U.S. data-set. Despite the CDC stopping to track the vaccinated and hospitalized data in the U.S., the panel was allowed to consider the vaccinated and hospitalized outcomes from the U.K. and Israel {Source Link}:
[Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA leading expert in vaccines,] – “added the meeting focused on almost real-time analyses compared to what is happening in the world, and the goal remains slowing the spread of COVID-19, which is killing almost 2,000 Americans daily.
The question the advisory panel was originally given to consider only used the U.S. data, a small dataset, despite the presentations including data from the U.K. and Israel.
Marks instructed the panel to consider all the data, noting, “This is not a legal proceeding, this is a science proceeding, so you can take all the data into account.” (link)
By looking at the vaccinated/hospitalized rates in the U.K and Israel, a data-set intentionally not recorded by U.S. health officials, the panel rejected the Pfizer request for a booster shot, noting the efficacy just wasn’t there. However, if the panel had only looked at the data approved by the CDC, the Pfizer vaccine efficacy would have looked much better because the vaccinated/hospitalized data was intentionally not recorded.
This my friends is how the healthcare of the U.S. is being manipulated by politics and Big Pharma.
Photo's and more at link
The long time top officials at the FDA who resigned clearly did so in protest to the government abuse taking place.
Here is a glimpse some of the discussion of Pfizer's latest request for a booster and why it was only approved for elderly.
----
----------
----
----------
Video Conference: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – 9/17/2021
the CDC is guilty of KNOWING genocide.
the CDC demanded pregnant women and breast feeding women
be VAX-raped with UNTESTED (both for increasing ongoing
cancers and making NEW cancers) nanomaterials and
text-derived NEW VIROIDS.
why? to decrease the population.
makes the FIB ignoring 100 raped athletic
girls, seem minor in comparison.
BOTH ARE SADISTIC CRIMES BY GOV’T.
It's TIME to DownSize DC!
Restore the Constitution!Size DC!
It’s the prescription model, where you need another dose at regular intervals. Forever.
This is the one that LOTS of folks are waiting for...including me..!
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/06/novavax-now-best-covid-19-vaccine/619276/
yep
Nullification of the Nuremberg Codes.
I hate to say it but we’re at the tipping point. These codes were enacted in 1947 after the acts of Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele and his ilk. Now we, the American citizen, are the test subjects just as the Nazis of WWII Germany. Under these rules, anyone who violates them is considered a genocidal war criminal. This includes those that give material support.
The ten points of the Nuremberg Code for human experimentation are as follows:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the effects upon his health or person, which may come from his participation in the experiment.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made, and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
No one in our government at any level is opposed to the abuse of its citizens. It’s quite clear there are physical reactions to the vaccine including death. The percentage may be small, but we don’t know the long term effects to those who have taken it since there is no clinical trial and the FDA has not approved it yet.
Anyone who speaks out against the vaccine on social is shut down as will I. We are living in a fascist society now supported by proxy by the Government.
The officers of these Pfascist pharmaceutical korporations need to be hauled in to trial at Nuremberg II along with the government bureaucrats who supported this crime against humanity.
p
Of course, its always, Follow the Money”.
From the aticle: “[…] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitors hospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1.”
That statement is simply incorrect and another example of the lengths the anti-vaxxers will go to propagate false and misleading information. If one reads the article one will find this statement: “Beginning May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections to investigating only those among patients who are hospitalized or die, thereby focusing on the cases of highest clinical and public health significance. CDC will continue to lead studies in multiple U.S. sites to evaluate vaccine effectiveness and collect information on all COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections regardless of clinical status. Additional information and resources to help public health departments and laboratories investigate and report COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html.
End Quote.
True that !
Personally, I think "the jab" contributes to the development of 'break-throughs',
which then results in forming the variants.
Viruses are known to mutate easily, and generally, and gradually, become less lethal.
Since the effectiveness of the original Pfizer 'jab' has been found to have lost some of its' efficacy,
might we now be on the road for a series of "booster shots", which will enrich Big Pharma further, ad nauseum ?
Big Pharma isn’t your friend.
(I'm not against COVID vaccination)
Now, the one thing that politicians like the best is RECYCLING.
Not trash.
Taxpayer dollars. They like to pay themselves WITH YOUR MONEY. They take it, give it to Pfizer, then they get it back. But it's not for you.
It's for the next campaign. or for their contributors who have businesses that can hoover up some of your money.
Recycling. It's just what they do.
None of the recognized doctors who are critical of how the Covid19 mess was handled are Anti-Vaxxers.
There are legitimate issues with the mRNA treatments for Covid19. Unlike normal vaccines these do not prevent infection, and do not give protection when the virus mutates.
I am not an anti-vaxer, but have not and will not take this injection. And I am old.
The insane censorship and threatening of those critical of the approach is against everything the medical profession professes.
The issue is the Big Lie. The Left and the Globalists have taken the crisis and used it as a hammer to subject the world.
The mRNA injections will not end the virus. Even if every human took the vaccine, it would not eliminate the virus.
The transmission is not just by those who are not vaccinated and get Covid. Over 80% of Israel citizens have been double vaccinated. And they are having a spike because the virus is morphed and the vaccinated are the carriers. And the enhanced response to the virus after the vaccination is what makes the disease worse.
In India where they had very low vaccination rate, one of the states shifted to more traditional treatment with Ivermectin and other approaches. They treated the aid workers first and it worked. Then they did mass treatment with a number of such drugs (with zinc). Now they are almost totally free of the virus and the immunity is broader than that with the mRNA vaccine. So when the virus mutates the body is more able to overcome the virus. And the body of un-vaccinated people does not over react to the virus when it is exposed. In people who have been mRNA vaccinated, ADE is present in some of the patients.
So, which approach is the more sane?
Totally Agree.
It is time to DownSize DC! And take away all that candy.
Self-ping
Bkmk
Are you suggesting a government agency is somehow colluding with a private corporation for the benefit of that private corporation's finances?
Do you believe that?
Yes. And the bureaucrap running the agency personally participates in the patents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.