See, you are equating session with war when that is not true. I don’t think these pansy ass leftists would fight anyway. SECESSION DOESN’T MEAN WAR. Get it? They are two different things.
“See, you are equating session with war...”
I cannot see how you extract that idea from what I said.
I was pretty clear about three different, unequal options, with war, itself, being the very last and very least desirable.
I in no way, shape or form claimed secession to be equal to war; in face I entirely agree with you that it is not.
My beef with secession is only that it fractures the Republic in a probably irreparable fashion, whereas even war MIGHT not lead to that same bitter end, and my fervent hope would be that the nation could be preserved whole, and re-founded upon The Constitution, imbued via CoS alteration with fresh force and vigor to actively, and affirmatively limit the Federal power.
Still, yes, I do prefer the peaceful secession of one or more States to the prospect of live fire combat, even at the cost of union.
Of course, it’s not up to me, but to the extent I have any say at all, that’s my vote.