Posted on 09/10/2021 9:25:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Dr. Anthony Fauci is a liar. That much has been clear for a very long time, though, it’s become more in your face as the months have worn on. The latest example comes courtesy of documents that prove Fauci lied about NIH funding going to gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.
So has the good doctor been humbled by his recent pantsing? Of course not. Instead, he’s continued his streak of dishonesty, with this latest example being especially egregious given the facts as we know them.
Dr. Fauci was finally asked why people with natural immunity should be required to get the covid vaccine given studies that show they have more protection. His response: “I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that.”
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) September 10, 2021
So let me get this straight. The head of NIAID and the face of the pandemic response has no idea whether natural immunity exists or is durable? He’s seen none of the studies that show natural immunity confers stronger protection than two doses of the vaccine? He hasn’t looked at any of the real-world data sets? He hasn’t seen any of the numbers from the United Kingdom or Israel? Really?
No one believes this garbage. Rather, Fauci is lying again, in my opinion, because if he acknowledges natural immunity and how strong it is, he acknowledges how ridiculous Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate is. Any mandate that doesn’t include carveouts for natural immunity is logically asinine and spitting in the face of the science. So instead of just telling the truth and noting that there should be exceptions, Fauci plays dumb as if the freaking head of NIAID just has no idea about how natural immunity works.
It’s enough to make someone want to punch a wall. Deep breaths and all that.
We are led by dishonest hacks who are putting politics above the health of Americans. That is why there’s vaccine hesitancy, not because of Fox News or Donald Trump. No one trusts these people because they do not deserve any trust. They continually mislead and make decisions based on what fits the narrative they want and not based on where the facts lead.
In short, Fauci should be fired, but we’ve known that since the first month of the pandemic.
At one point during the segment, Gupta predictably asked Fauci a very leading question that insinuated Biden was being too lenient with the impacted employers and employees by giving them the option to either get tested for the coronavirus once a week or get the vaccine.
“Why not just do the vaccine mandate and not say that the testing can be sort of this off-ramp?” Gupta wondered.
Here’s how their exchange went down (bolded emphasis added):
GUPTA: You know, when it comes to the mandates through the Department of Labor and companies that have a hundred or more employees, my understanding of what the President was saying, Dr. Fauci, was that either you get a vaccine, or you have to be tested regularly. And oftentimes, it seems like these two things are commingled, like, do one or the other. But in one case, you’re preventing it, and in the other case, you’re diagnosing it. Why not just do the vaccine mandate and not say that the testing can be sort of this off-ramp?
FAUCI: Well, I think the President is, you know, being somewhat moderate in his demand, if you want to call it that. And that there are some people who really don’t want to get vaccinated, but they don’t want to lose their job, you’ve got to give them an off lane. And the off-lane is if you get tested frequently enough, and find out you’re positive, you won’t come to work, and you won’t infect other people. So, it really is somewhat of a compromise there. Myself, I would make it just vaccinate or not. But he was trying to be moderate in what his pronouncement was.
There are two answers to this. The first is that he's lying, the second is that he's hopelessly incompetent at his job.
There are many free papers that absolutely adore Dr. Fauci
Correction:
There are many freepers that absolutely adore Dr. Fauci.
Crimes against humanity.
This is like going to the hardware store, asking if they have any nails in stock, and they answer that they do not have a firm answer on that.
Fauci is an overpaid moron.
“...he doesn’t have an idea if natural immunity exists or not?”
We’re back to what “it” is.
Natural immunity cannot exist as long as there is no way to destroy the virus. This is why people are getting sick more than one time. The virus isn’t dead and it can attack the body again and again until the body can clobber all of it in each attack. The vaccines are not designed to do that and it takes a long time for one body to create its own immunity.
To give you an idea, there are still outbreaks of the bubonic plague in the US every year. This virus today is the one that hit San Francisco in 1900 and has stayed the same and morphed to something different in other strains. It ain’t dead, Jim. It, in a lot of cases, just changed it clothes.
It is already clear, however, that the virus is changing too quickly, new variants are spreading too easily and vaccination is proceeding too slowly for herd immunity to be within reach anytime soon. Maybe never. Me, possibly never.
A good article:
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/herd-immunity
wy69
Are you sure of that?
WWII had “Nuremberg”
any chances of the same
Trials for Wuhan?
he has the answer
he doesn’t want to say the answer
Fauci and the rest want to make people forget what natural immunity is and block access to other known, inexpensive, and effective treatments. The idea is to present the vax (plus boosters ad infinitum) as the only of dealing with the rona.
I challenge you to Name ONE.
Fauci < Freedom.
Fauci paid for the development of the Fauci/China virus.
He belongs in prison.
Agree with you
Visit any of the vaccine threads.
All of those that are pro-vaccine or pro Fauci
House of Aristides
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.