These numbers are stupid. They say they canvassed 173,000 people, not had 173,000 “ghost votes.” Plus of those, they are saying 96,000 are from addresses where no one lived, and “34.23%” of those canvassed said they voted, but there is no record.
For God’s sake, use some common sense and critical thinking.
These numbers are stupid. They say they canvassed 173,000 people, not had 173,000 “ghost votes.” Plus of those, they are saying 96,000 are from addresses where no one lived, and “34.23%” of those canvassed said they voted, but there is no record.
For God’s sake, use some common sense and critical thinking.
/\
\/
I just assumed you were full of crap
But I read it anyways
Yup, what you claimed is crap.
It is a very large statistical sample which they are able to extrapolate from. It is very accurate since it was an actual door to door canvass.
No they didn't.
“They say they canvassed 173,000 people, not had 173,000 “ghost votes.”
Forgive my ignorance on the use of the word canvassed. I am not sure what your comment is. Trying to use some common sense and critical thinking.
Did they go out and contacted 173,000 people who claim their vote is missing?
Ghost votes: 96000 ghost votes are where the voter then not exist?
Did they canvassed a total of 269,000 (ghost plus missing) votes?
I must wonder how many voters were canvassed to come up with the 34.23%. Can you show the math for that number, I am sure I am missing something here.
Is there another report you are reading? GP does a wonderful job of hiding important info, not well layout.
You posted your discrediting comments within 5 minutes of this thread being put up, yet the report is about 11 pages long with lots of links etc.
Amazing.
Obviously, you didn't even bother to read the report, which nowhere claims "they canvassed 173,000 people". Next time around, perhaps you should take your own advice (i.e., "use some common sense and critical thinking" ;^)...