I would have to agree. The article is filled with statements that are incorrect and easy to cross-check.
The are plenty of reasons to be wary about the claims of danger posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and even more reasons to be suspicious of the claims for the purported remedies.
This article does not help to cut through the fog and the intentional disinformation on the problem.
‘This article does not help to cut through the fog and the intentional disinformation on the problem.’
not yet, but give it time...after all, it’s dated in the future...