To: hawkaw
I think the title is misleading. I think people are carrying a higher viral load than the older strains is what the paper was saying…Of course that’s what the paper’s saying.
The dead end anti-vaxxers are reduced to posting this same idiotic, obvious misrepresentation over and over because the benefits of the vaccines are so overwhelmingly obvious.
They’re grasping at the weakest straw out there.
31 posted on
08/27/2021 5:13:28 AM PDT by
semimojo
To: semimojo
The dead end anti-vaxxers
Yup. That is me. The only way I am getting jabbed is if they put a needle in my corpse.
44 posted on
08/27/2021 6:03:12 AM PDT by
cgbg
(A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
To: semimojo
IF this is the paper I’m thinking of, the older strain was from before there WERE any jabs, so it’s a distinction without a difference.
58 posted on
08/27/2021 6:59:49 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: semimojo
because the benefits of the vaccines are so overwhelmingly obvious. On what planet?
Interesting, because I don’t consider allergic reactions, blood clot formation, and myocarditis “benefits” of the vax, unless of course, that is what they were designed to do.
72 posted on
08/27/2021 8:09:20 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson