source -
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/former-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-joins-pfizers-board-of-directors-2019-06-28
Posted on 08/23/2021 11:32:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
They would lose more than government funding. They would lose their EUA and IF THE LAW IS FOLLOWED, would no longer be able to be administered.
Sure, if you mean they are buying doses from them, or reimbursing for doses from them.
The real reason was in order to get all these fast track status and emergency use authorization
if it was shown there were meds already effective afainst it they would not be able to get fast track sratus and it would take the normal 10-15 years of trials and studies
AFGHANISTAN
well now that the jab has been secretly approved no excuse not to approve ivermectin hydroxy etc...
of course they won’t do it because it will give people an out
Because of government funding? Maybe…..No
Because Blackrock and Vanguard would lose billions in government money? Absolutely YES.
Because the big hospital corporations would lose billions NOT treating patients but still getting paid? Absolutely YES.
The ZIVERDO pack developed by the Indians is $2.95.
Let Blackrock or Vanguard figure out a way to sell them for $295 or more and it’ll be ZIVERDO packs for everyone.
add this. India is bring criminal charges against the WHO and Merck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WenJhxVWekU
Ping
I’d say that is certainly ONE of the reasons.
It’s also effective for those who have taken the risky shots, from what I’ve heard.
Can’t have that!
They don’t call it Big Pharma for nothing.
Reference bump-CV19
source -
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/former-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-joins-pfizers-board-of-directors-2019-06-28
I disagree that its all money. The company that they call an NGO who funded the Wuhan Lab was previously called “The Wildlife Trust”. Their previous incarnation was changed to the EcoHealth Alliance” which has created virus’ that stop human population growth. They use US federal money to research virus’. They used to help wildlife by protecting the rain forest and buying land. Then they decided that the human population was the real problem to climate change and deforestation.
Then we disagree. No worries.
It could be both.
Especially given that maniac CornPop was trying to get nominated. But he also has 3 Blackrock executives working in his admin.
well, yeah...
rolling_stone wrote: “well now that the jab has been secretly approved no excuse not to approve ivermectin hydroxy etc...”
The approval process wasn’t a secret. Pfizer and BioNTech submitted some 340,000 pages in their application for full approval.
“Are Effective COVID Medications Like Ivermectin Being Suppressed Because Their Successful Treatments Could Cause Vaccines to Lose Government Funding?”
In a short answer, yes.
To expand on that answer, still yes. There have proven to be so many advantages to a regime bent on instituting a command-and-control economy on the territory once known as “the United States of America”, at the expense of the formerly free, capitalist-based, representative republic it once was, that it is hard to give up that new-found route to perpetual political power. Doing so by incremental means, just tinkering around the edges, to chip away at the firm foundations of the Great American Experiment, just was not fast enough any more, and besides, the frog in the pan of warming water on the stove was getting ready to jump out.
Now, the enormous amount of research and high-level scientific research has produced several pathways to overcoming the ravages of this new disease that was unleashed upon the world, but there were already effective means of controlling the disease, once the existing drugs and medical preparations were determined to be curative, and repurposed to this use.
But these other treatments spoiled the game almost before it was well launched, and had to be suppressed by any means available, including just plain denial of any efficacy that could be attributed to the existing medications.
For starters, one thing was clear. Masks. Do. Not. Work. Not then, definitely not now, and perhaps not ever, given the state of technology being applied to making various kinds of breathing masks, which work perfectly well for screening out dust particles, but are totally ineffective against anything so small as the COVID-19 Wuhan virus particle.
And yet, the command-and-control regime demands them everywhere, whether even remotely effective or not.
People do not die directly from a COVID-19 Wuhan virus infection. Most often, it is from a secondary infection, or an overly powerful response of the body’s own immune system kicking to counter and contain the virus. Either way, a compromised immune system plays a major part in the morbidity of the infection, and may have, in other circumstances, caused the death of the individual anyway, just on a more accelerated timetable.
For this, among other reasons, is how the infection kills. Delaying effective treatment until the progress of the disease has escalated to a level that overwhelms the body’s natural defenses, is both poor management, and misplaced emphasis on timeliness, making swift decisions only after the later stages set in.
Ping
difficult to keep up with the number of frauds being committed...
....kinda like a biden speech
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.