It does not matter how many “whistleblowers” come out of the woodwork.
That machines were connected to the internet is unimportant without PROOF that votes were altered by that mechanism and in sufficient numbers to change the outcome.
You believing harder that this is true because of the internet connection is not important in the grand scheme of things.
Well, I would challenge you in that the people that MAY pay attention - have not until this point, BECAUSE someone said emphatically (untruthfully, albeit) - A. NO they can’t be connected to the Internet) - so they don’t proceed with B, SINCE it is possible to be connected to the Internet, THEN now let’s see IF someone got in the machine, then C. are there signs that they changed something. D. Can we determine if it was intentional. E. What was the effect of their change?
What we call in programming short-circuiting - not logically getting in the front door because the first premise is false.
Are you aware at all of the multiple statistical proofs?
And if everything is just fine, why are election boards and “officials” breaking the law just to keep from letting OUR information out?
Your thoughts could surely be more noble.
“That machines were connected to the internet is unimportant...”
Are they supposed to be connected to the Internet?
“You believing harder that this is true because of the internet connection is not important in the grand scheme of things.”
Here we have another person strongly believing that the tottering, befuddled senile old man got 80 million votes.
By the way, for what possible reason were the machines connected to the internet, while the head of Dominion swears they were not able to be connected and were not connected?
...You believing harder that this is true because of the internet connection is not important in the grand scheme of things...
so why did many people lie and say machines were not connected to the internet? splain me dat!
You are a shill... If Dominion VP Coomer was promising people that Trump wasn’t going to win this time around and he would see to it... what was he talking about?
What happened to all the down ballot votes?
Why did 5 states stop counting at the exact same time?
IF you don’t see that there was fraud it is because you don’t want to see it.
JN, for your consideration:
The symposium demonstrated that at least one election machine was connected to the internet before, during and after the election. That is quite important and relevant to the issue of election integrity.
To the extent the forensic image studied at the symposium was authentic, it offered compelling evidence that one or more, if not all, similarly connected machines were in violation of federal election statutes and therefore in essence “de-certified”. Which is to say the product of each such machine was prohibited by law from being used to calculate the outcome.
In this regard, real time software updates should be seen as “being connected to the internet”; further, updates subsequent to the election may well have been the means of destroying evidence.
Such reasoning alone clearly offers a rationale basis to formally reject the outcome of the election at least at the down-ballot state level.
...unimportant without PROOF that votes were altered by that mechanism and in sufficient numbers to change the outcome.
This goes to the issue of a corrupted final count. The white hat geeks at the symposium said it could take a few weeks to analyze the forensic image to determine this separate question.